Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4468 (RAJ)

RAJENDRA PRASAD AND ORS v. STATE OF RAJ AND ANR

CW/173/2008 · 2025-01-22

Sameer Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:3187] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 173/2008 1. Rajendra Prasad S/o Tota Ram, aged about 29 years, R/o post Basai, Vaya Gandala, Tehsil Behror, District Alwar, [Roll No. 395848]. 2. Ramanand Arya S/o Hajari Lal, aged about 28 years, R/o Village & Post Basai, Vaya Gandala, Tehsil Behror, District Alwar, [Roll No. 135736]. 3. Yad Ram S/o Leela Ram, aged about 27 years, R/o Village Nimohar, Post Anntpura, Tehsil Behror, District Alwar [Roll No.122575]. 4. Rajendra Kumar Meena S/o Lallu Ram Meena, aged about 29 years, R/o village Jharoli, Post Raneela, Tehsil Bamanwas, District Sawai Madhopur [Roll No.244308]. 5. Ashok Kumar Harijan S/o Mehar Chand Harijan, aged about 30 years, R/o village Nangli Jagir, Post Basai via Gandala, Tehsil Behror, District Alwar [Roll No.246806]. 6. Arun Kumar Mahawar, S/o Shri Hazari Lal Mahawar, aged about 28 years, R/o Village & Post Basai, Vaya Gandala, Tehsil Behror, District Alwar, [Roll No.125625]. 7. Satish Kumar Sharma S/o Mamraj, aged about 34 years, R/o village Nangli Jagir, Post Basai via Gandala, Tehsil Behror, District Alwar [Roll No.122942]. 8. Ashok Kumar Nayak S/o Kishan Lal Nayak aged about 38 years, R/o village & Post Basai, Vaya Gandala, Tehsil Behror, District Alwar, [Roll No.136686]. 9. Karan Pal S/o Guru Dayal, aged about 29 years, R/o village & Post Basai, Tehsil Behror, District Alwar, [Roll No.126943]. 10. Krishan Kumar Meena S/o Shri Hari Singh Meena, aged about 31 years, R/o Village Tejpura, Post Sodawas, Tehsil Mundawar, District Alwar [Roll No.133520]. 11. Rajesh Kumar Mahawar S/o Ram Swaroop aged about 36 years, R/o village and Post Basai, via Gandala, Tehsil Behror, District Alwar, [Roll No.397406]. 12. Sanjay Kumar S/o Kanhaiya Lal, aged about 28 years, R/o village and Post Basai, via Gandala, Tehsil Behror, District Alwar, [Roll No.125524]. 13. Subhash Chander S/o Kanhaiya Lal, aged about 26 years, R/o village and Post Basai, via Gandala, Tehsil Behror, District Alwar, [Roll No.131624]. 14. Raj Rishi Mahawar S/o Shri Ram Swaroop, aged about 30 [2025:RJ-JP:3187] (2 of 3) [CW-173/2008] years, R/o village and Post Basai, via Gandala, Tehsil Behror, District Alwar, [Roll No.391018]. 15. Muni Ram Meena S/o Lala Ram Meena, aged about 25 years, R/o village and Post Basai, via Gandala, Tehsil Behror, District Alwar, [Roll No.135669]. 16. Sarjeet Arya S/o Mool Chand Arya, aged about 25 years, R/o village and Post Basai, via Gandala, Tehsil Behror, District Alwar, [Roll No.131865]. 17. Suresh Kumar S/o Tota Ram, aged about 22 years, R/o village and Post Basai, via Gandala, Tehsil Behror, District Alwar, [Roll No.124727]. 18. Rohitash S/o Prabhati Lal, aged about 32 years, R/o village and Post Basai, via Gandala, Tehsil Behror, District Alwar. 19. Ramdhar Meena S/o Shri Kishore Meena, aged about 32 years, R/o village and post office Kamalpura, Tehsil Nadoti, District Karauli [Roll No.111836]. 20. Sanjay Bhardwaj S/o Shri Om Prakash Sharma, aged about 35 years, R/o Kherli, District Alwar [Roll No.525321]. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Rajasthan through its Secretary, Education Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer through its Secretary. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. Imran Khan HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 22/01/2025 Matter pertains to the year 2008. Learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that an advertisement was issued in the year 2006, inviting applications for 250 posts of Teacher (Special Education). [2025:RJ-JP:3187] (3 of 3) [CW-173/2008] On perusal of the file, it is analyzed that no active efforts are taken by the petitioner to contest the matter. Even today, when the matter was called, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed in default. Howsoever, liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach this Court if the need so arises in future. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/131