p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) NO.20434 OF 2025 Ashok Kumar Palei …. Petitioner Mr.A.K.Pandey, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Others …. Opp.Parties Mr. J.K.Ray, ASC CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DIXIT KRISHNA SHRIPAD ORDER Order No. 30.07.2025 01. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. The petitioner knocks the doors of the writ Court aggrieved by the non-consideration of his representation dated 15.01.2025, a copy whereof is available at Annexure-7, wherein he has sought for promotion to the higher level on the ground that the juniors have already been accorded such promotion. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the promotion on par with the juniors has been given, the effective date of promotion needs to be antedated. 5. Learned Additional Standing Counsel appearing for the official Opp. Parties opposed the writ petition making submission in justification of the stand that the date allotted to the petitioner for the purpose of promotion is perfect. Having so contended, now he agrees to instruct his client to look into the grievance of the petitioner, as has been aired in the subject representation in a time-bound way. p. 2 This fair enough. 6. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of prescribing the period of eight weeks for consideration of the subject representation and to convey its result to the petitioner as well. No No cost. (Dixit Krishna Shripad) Judge Manoj