/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAV (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY ,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE-^ PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 11241 OF 2025 Between: K.C. Vijay Kumar, S/o.late George, Aged about 65 years, R/o. D.No.227-2, Church Compound, Gudur, Balaji District. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Tirupati, Balaji District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sri kalahasthi, Balaji District 4. The Tahsildar, Renigunta, Balaji District ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents for not disposing the petitioner's representations dt. 02.05.2022 and dt.01.07.2022 before the respondents for petitioner's name in revenue records/web land for the petitioner's lands in Sy.No.408/5 an extent of Ac. 4-93 cents situated in kharkhambadi Village, Reni gunta Mandal, Balaji District@Tirupati District besides violation of principles of Natural Justice Respondents to consider the petitioner's representations dt. 02.05.2022 and dt.01.07.2022 for mutation for petitioner's lands in Sy.No.408/5 an extent of 0 Ac.4-93 cents situat^ at Karkambadi Village, Renigunta Mandal, District, forthwith. mutation of as illegal, arbitrary. consequently direct the Baiji lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere into the petitioner's lands in Sy.No.408/5 an extent of Ac.4-93 cents situated at Karkambadi Village, Renigunta Mandal, Baiji District respondents not to by directing the eate any third party rights in land in Sy.No. 408/5 an extent of Ac.4-9^ents situated at Karkambadi Village, Renigunta Mandal, Baiji District. Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI. Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI. PRAKASH C Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: APHC010226922025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] WEDNESDAY .THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 11241/2025 Between: ...PETITIONER K C Vijay Kumar AND ...RESPONDENT{S) The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner; 1.PRAKASH C Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following; 2 NV,J W.P. NO. 11241 OF 2025 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 11241/2025 ORDER: The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following relief: to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents for not disposing the petitioners representations dt 02.05.2022 and dt 01.07.2022 before the respondents for mutation of petitioner’s name in revenue records/web land for the petitioners lands in Sy. No. 408/5 an extent of Ac. 4-93 cents situated in kharkhambadi Village, Reni gunta Mandal, Balaji District@Tirupati District as Illegal, arbitrary, besides violation of principles of Natural Justice consequently direct the Respondents to consider the petitioner’s representations dt.02.05.2022 and dt.01.07.2022 for mutation for petitioners lands in Sy.No.408/5 an extent of Ac. 4-93 cents situated at Karkambadi Village, Renigunta Mandal, Baiji District forthwith and to pass such... ” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents. 3. Though the petitioner made several allegations against the respondents, during hearing, learned counsel for the petitionerrequested this Court, without touching the merits of the case, to issue a direction to the respondents to consider and dispose of the representations dated 02.05.2022 and 01.07.2022 submitted by the petitioner. 4. Learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the th respondents furnished written instructions dated 29.04.2025 issued by the 4 respondent, wherein it is stated that; 3 W.P.N0.11241 OF 2025 “5. The reason for filing of present writ petition is that though he has possession over the claimed land, his representations have not been considered, hence sought for direction to consider the representation as prayed for. 6. In this context it is submitted, in due process of law, the petitioner will be issued notice calling for enquiry to produce the purported DKT.No.423/4/1310 dated 31.05.1981 said to be granted and other congnizable documentary evidences. 1. It is further submitted that after hearing the pleading and perusing the documentary evidences, appropriate action will be taken on the representations dt.02.05.2022 and 01.07.2022.” In view of the submission of the learned Government Pleader for 5. Revenue appearing for the respondents, this Court need not decide the truth or otherwise of the allegations made in the petition. This Court is that no such direction be issued, in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in “The Government of India v. P.Venkatesh^”, wherein the Apex Court held that such orders may make for a quick or easy disposal of cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions. But, they do not serve to the cause of justice. As the learned counsel for the petitioner himself requested to issue a direction to dispose of the representations dated 02.05.2022 and 01.07.2022, this Court find no other alternative except to issue such direction. conscious In the result, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the respondents to consider and dispose of the representations dated 02.05.2022 and 01.07.2022, after providing opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned, within a period of three (03) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. 6. 2004(1) see 769^' , 4 NVJ /’■> W.P.N0.11241 OF 2025 Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed. ^aL~ RAO ACHARI assistant registrar //TRUE COPY// SECTION OP0CER. To, 1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department,State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, Guntur District.[By Special Messenger] 2. The District Collector, Tirupati, Baiaji District. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sri kalahasthi, Baiaji District 3. 4. The Tahsildar, Renigunta, Baiaji District.[2 to 4 by RPAD] One CC to SRI. PRAKASH C Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE ,High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 5. 6. 7. Three CD Copies HIGH COURT DATED:30/04/2025 ORDER WP.No.11241 of 2025 THE WRIT PETITION IS DISPOSED OF WITHOUT COSTS