Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44662 (AP)

KAMEPALLI VIJAY SAI MANIKANTA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/4219/2025 · 2025-04-29

T Mallikarjuna Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

mm, COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAV^||^pp^^, <- IN THE HIGH WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE I' iir:-! k.- ••V. iPRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4219 OF 2025 Between: Kamepalli Vijay Sai Manikanta, S/o Anantha Srinivash Rao, Aged 22 Years, B.Tech Final Year (CSE), Door No. 4-40, Duddukur, Prakasam District Andhra Pradesh Petitloner/A-4 AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, (Tadepalli Police Station, Guntur District) Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravati. Respondent/Complainant Petition under Sections 482 of BNSS (old 438 of Cr.P.C), praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the Petitioner/A-4 on bail in the event of arrest in connection with in Crime No. 109/2025 of Tadepalli Police Station, Guntur District. The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Sri RAM BABU DEVAVARAPU, Advocate for the Petitioner and of PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent and the Court made the following: the honourable SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO rPiMINAL PETITION NO: 4219 OF 2025 ORDER:- Criminal Petition, u/Sec.482 of B.N.S.S is filed on behalf of the petitioner/A4 to grant anticipatory bail i No 109/2025 of Tadepalli Police Station, Guntur District, has been registered against the petitioner herein and others offence punishable u/Secs. 126(2), 137(2), 109(1), 351(2) read The In connection with Crime A case 2) for the with 3(5) of the BNS. of the prosecution, in brief, is that, on 07.03.2025 at The case hours at service road towards Mangalagiri in Tadepalli, the de facto complainant and his friend Pavan are returning from Tadepalli in their car, accused tried to attack them, then the complainant and his friend rushed fast in their car. The accused chased them in a i20 car and wrongfully restrained their car and forcefully brought complainant out of and beat him and forcefully taken him into their car and taken away 3) 23.30 the car fields of Mellampudi Village. Meanwhile, his friend Pavan ran away. near The accused beat him with hands and rods causing bleeding injuries on face and head. Meanwhile they asked for Nagendra and warned that they will kill them any way. The accused taken knife, and tried to kill complainant, in fear of life, the complainant shouted loudly and ran from 2 their custody. Meanwhile some students of KLU and some farmers to scene by listening to sounds, then the accused Learned counsel for the petitioner came ran away, contended that this Court granted Anticipatory Bail to A5 and A6 in Crl.P.No.3078 of 2025 and also to A7 and A10 in Crl.P.No.3404 of 2025 and order as this petition also stands on the same footing. On the other hand, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor disputed the said fact. 4) prayed to pass the same 5) has not 6) Considering the submissions, this Court has carefuiiy gone through the material piaced on record i.e. order in Crl.P.No.3078 of 2025 Crl.P.No.3404 of 2025 which shows that the and case of the petitioner is on the same footing as that of the petitioners in Crl.P.Nos.3078 & 3404 of 2025. Evidently, basing on the confession of the co-accused, the name# of the petitioner was added in the F.I.R. and in iieu of confession, nothing incriminating materiai has been iaid by the prosecution. As such, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the terms and conditions. petitioner with the same 7) Accordingiy, the petitioner herein/A4 in the above crime is directed to surrender before the Station House Officer concerned within two (02) weeks from today and on such surrender, the petitioner shall be released on bail on his executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- 3 (Rupees twenty thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the arresting police officials and also on condition that the petitioner shall make himself available for investigation as and when required and that they shall not cause any threat, inducement or promise to the prosecution witnesses. The petitioner shall appear before the concerning Station House Officer, once in a fortnight, for a period of two months. 8) With the above directions, the Criminal Petition is allowed. SD/- N.NAGAMMA assistant) registrar //TRUE COPY// TION OFFICER F To, 1. The Station House Officer, Tadepalli Police Station, Guntur District 2. One CC to SRI. RAM BABU DEVAVARAPU Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of AP [OUT] 4. One spare copy Kj \ \ /■ y % HIGH COURT ■v TMR,J DATED:30/04/2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.4219 of 2025 ALLOWED i