Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4466 (UTT)

DINESH RAWAL ALIAS DEEWN SINGH RAWAL v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

C528/398/2025 · 2025-04-23

Vivek Bharti Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:3039 HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Misc Application No.398 of 2025 23 April, 2025 Dinesh Rawal alias Deewan Singh --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand & Anr. --Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Ms. Divya Jain, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Deepak Bisht, Deputy A.G. with Mr. Akshay Latwl, A.G.A. for the State Ms. Reema Rana, Advocate holding brief of Ms. Sadaf, Advocate for respondent no.2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Vivek Bharti Sharma, J. (Oral) By means of present petition, petitioner seeks to quash the charge-sheet no.01 of 2024 dated 21.06.2024 and the summoning/cognizance order dated 28.06.2024 as well as the entire proceedings of S.T. No.10 of 2024 “State vs. Dinesh Rawal alias Deewan Singh” under Section 376 of IPC and Section 66-E, 67, 67-A of I.T. Act, pending in the court of Addl. Sessions Judge, Pithoragarh. 2. In view of the fact that a Compounding Application was filed by the parties before this Court, this Court, vide order dated 08.04.2025, had directed the parties to appear before the Secretary, DLSA, District Pithoragarh to get their statements recorded and to verify the compromise deed. 3. Pursuant to such order, Secretary, DLSA, Haridwar has submitted report dated 11.04.2025 which indicates that the parties have settled the dispute amicably and have also verified 1 2025:UHC:3039 the contents of the compromise. 4. In view of the above, Compounding Application IA No.1/2025 is allowed. As a consequence thereof, charge-sheet no.01 of 2024 dated 21.06.2024 and the summoning/cognizance order dated 28.06.2024 as well as the entire proceedings of S.T. No.10 of 2024 “State vs. Dinesh Rawal alias Deewan Singh” under Section 376 of IPC and Section 66-E, 67, 67-A of I.T. Act, pending in the court of Addl. Sessions Judge, Pithoragarh, are hereby quashed. 5. Accordingly, present petition is disposed of, on the basis of compromise/settlement arrived at between the parties. (Vivek Bharti Sharma, J.) 23.04.2025 Rajni 2 RAJINI GUSAI N Digitally signed by RAJINI GUSAIN DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=97cfa6e4cbd49c07b876db48 448ac3701a9ae475a2547e4b7f1d9b1f 17d01342, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=8D039BC77BD1A2222B 4DF4FC80D4557562F95BEBA013F530 616A158A0A878BD8, cn=RAJINI GUSAIN Date: 2025.04.24 17:35:08 +05'30'