[2025:RJ-JP:49420] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18622/2025 Udai Raj Meena S/o Shri Ratan Singh Meena, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Shyam Sarovar Colony, Bayana District Bharatpur (Rajasthan). Presently Working On The Post Of Principal At Government Senior Secondary School Raseri, Block Bayana, District Bharatpur ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Education Department, Secretariate, Jaipur 2. Director, Secondary Education, Directorate, Bikaner 3. Chief Block Education Officer, Block, Bayana District Bharatpur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma Mr. Vijay Pathak For Respondent(s) : Ms. Pooja Sharma, AAAG, Mr. Vishal Kumar and Mr. S.M. Sharma for Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 04/12/2025 1. Instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with following prayer:- It is, therefore, prayed that this writ petition may kindly be accepted and allowed and by an appropriate order or direction, the order dated 23.11.2025, qua petitioner may kindly be quashed and set aside and the respondents may kindly be directed to allow the petitioner to continue as Principal at Government Senior Secondary School Raseri, Block Bayana, District Bharatpur with all consequential benefits to him. Any other appropriate order or direction, which this Hon’ble Court may deem just and proper in the [2025:RJ-JP:49420] (2 of 3) [CW-18622/2025] facts of the present case, may also be passed in favour of the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner while placing reliance upon order dated 27.02.2025 passed by the Division Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur in D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No.332/2025 : Pradeep Kumar Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. submits that the wife of the petitioner is posted in the District of Bharatpur and the present petitioner is transferred from Government Sr. Secondary School, Raseri, Block Bayana, District Bharatpur to Government Senior Secondary School Madalda, District Banswara. He also submits that it is duty of the respondents that the petitioner be transferred to the same place where his wife is working, who is also a Government servant. 3. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned AAG appearing on behalf of the respondents and he submits that due to administrative exigency the transfer has been effected but considering the grievance as raised by the petitioner, the petitioner is free to make a representation to the Department, which will consider the representation on the grounds raised by the petitioner and this petition can be disposed at this stage. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 5. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision [2025:RJ-JP:49420] (3 of 3) [CW-18622/2025] to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 6. In the meanwhile, impugned order dated 23.11.2025 qua the present petitioner shall remain stayed till disposal of the representation, by the respondents. 7. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /346