Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44656 (PNJ)

KALINDI HARNAL AND ANOTHER v. SUSHANT SHARMA AND ANOTHER

CR/2239/2025 · 2025-08-04

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 284 Kalindi Harnal and another Sushant Sharma (through Legal Power of Attorney Holders) and another CORAM: Present: NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) the order dated 13.2.2025 (Annexure P Judge (Sr. Divn.), Chandigarh whereby the application filed by the petitioners under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC has been dismissed. further proceedings before the learned Court. that the present revision petition respondent Chandigarh seeking permission to withdraw the main Guardian Petition instituted by the respondents. Learned Senior Counsel has CR-2239-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.2239 of 2025 (O & M) Date of decision : Kalindi Harnal and another Versus Sushant Sharma (through Legal Power of Attorney Holders) and CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Rajiv Atma Ram, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Arjun Partap Atma Ram, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Avin K. Sandhu, Advocate for the applicant-respondent No.1(a). Mr. H.P.S. Sandhu, Advocate for respondent No.1(b). NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) The present revision petition has been filed for setting aside the order dated 13.2.2025 (Annexure P-8) passed by the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Chandigarh whereby the application filed by the petitioners under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC has been dismissed. Vide order dated 08.4.2025, while issuing Notice of Motion, further proceedings before the learned trial Court had been stayed by this It is submitted by learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners that the present revision petition has been respondent has filed an application before the Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), igarh seeking permission to withdraw the main Guardian Petition instituted by the respondents. Learned Senior Counsel has 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ivil Revision No.2239 of 2025 (O & M) Date of decision :-04.08.2025 …..Petitioners Sushant Sharma (through Legal Power of Attorney Holders) and …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Rajiv Atma Ram, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Arjun Partap Atma Ram, Advocate Ms. Avin K. Sandhu, Advocate respondent No.1(a). The present revision petition has been filed for setting aside ) passed by the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Chandigarh whereby the application filed by the petitioners under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC has been dismissed. Vide order dated 08.4.2025, while issuing Notice of Motion, trial Court had been stayed by this It is submitted by learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners has been rendered infructuous as the before the Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), igarh seeking permission to withdraw the main Guardian Petition instituted by the respondents. Learned Senior Counsel has handed over a VIJAY ASIJA 2025.08.06 20.14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document copy of the order dated 15.4.2025 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Chandigarh, in which, by the respondents. submitted that however, considered by the learned trial Court in view of the fact that vide order dated 08.4.2025 this Court has stayed further proceedings before the learned trial Court. files Power of Attorney on behalf of respondent No.1(a). The same is taken on record. Learned counsel for resp aforesaid application has been filed by trial Court seeking withdrawal of the main in view of the statement m praying for withdrawal of the main Guardian Petition, the present revision petition may be disposed of. terms of the statement made by learned counsel for respondent No.1. August 04 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No CR-2239-2025 (O & M) copy of the order dated 15.4.2025 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Chandigarh, in which, reference is mad by the respondents. The said copy of the order is taken on record. submitted that however, the said application considered by the learned trial Court in view of the fact that vide order ed 08.4.2025 this Court has stayed further proceedings before the learned trial Court. Ms. Avin K. Sandhu, Advocate has put in appearance and files Power of Attorney on behalf of respondent No.1(a). The same is taken on record. Learned counsel for resp aforesaid application has been filed by respondent No.1 trial Court seeking withdrawal of the main Guardian Petition. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner prays that therefore in view of the statement made by learned counsel for the respondent No.1 praying for withdrawal of the main Guardian Petition, the present revision petition may be disposed of. Heard. In view of the above, the present petition is terms of the statement made by learned counsel for respondent No.1. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. 4, 2025 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 copy of the order dated 15.4.2025 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Sr. reference is made to the said application filed The said copy of the order is taken on record. It is the said application for withdrawal is not being considered by the learned trial Court in view of the fact that vide order ed 08.4.2025 this Court has stayed further proceedings before the Ms. Avin K. Sandhu, Advocate has put in appearance and files Power of Attorney on behalf of respondent No.1(a). The same is taken on record. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 admits that the respondent No.1 before the learned Guardian Petition. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner prays that therefore ade by learned counsel for the respondent No.1 praying for withdrawal of the main Guardian Petition, the present revision , the present petition is disposed of in terms of the statement made by learned counsel for respondent No.1. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.08.06 20.14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document