Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44656 (AP)

K SAHEB REDDY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/26267/2024 · 2025-04-29

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

M V ’ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) -f. i ' ® 3:: WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL ff; TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE 1 >P ... V Vv^ A- , • J PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26267 OF 2024 Between: K Saheb Reddy, s/o. K. Subbi Reddy, Secretary/Chief Executive Officer (Under Order of Removal) Penumantra Large Sized Co-Operative Society Ltd Penumantra, Penumantra Mandal, West Godavari District Aged about 59 years, R/o. H.no. 2-2, Sivalayam Street Neggipudi Village and Mandal, West Godavari District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Co- Operation Department, Velagapudi, Guntur District, A.P 2. The District Co-Operative Officer, West Godavari, Andhra Pradesh. 3. The Penumantra Large Sized Co-Operative Credit Society Ltd, Rep by its Chairman, Person-in-charge Committee, Penumantra, Penumantra Village, West Godavari. 4. The District Level Committee-cum-Appellate Authority, District Cooperative Central Bank Limited, Rep by its Member/Convener-cum - Chief Executive Officer West Godavari. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ or order or direction • i. more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents Nos. and 3 in not taking the Petitioner into service/re instate the petitioner into service in pursuance of the orders of this Honble Court passed in W.P No.24548 of 2023 Dt 13.09.2024 as being illegal, irregular, arbitrary, contrary to the Orders passed by this Honble Court and consequently to direct the Respondent No. 2 and 3 to reinstate the Petitioner into service forthwith with all consequential benefits and pay the salaries from the date of Removal of Service i.e., 28.02.2017 till date of retirement in pursuance of the orders of this Honble Court passed in W.P No.24548 of 2023 dated 13.09.2024. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No 2 and 3 to reinstate the Petitioner into service forthwith with all consequential benefits and pay the salaries from the date of Removal of Service i.e., 28.02.2017 till date of retirement in pursuance of the orders of this Honble Court passed in W.P No.24548 of 2023 Dt.13.09.2024. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. PULIPATI RADHIKA Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2: GP FOR COOPERATION Counsel for the Respondent No. 3: SRI YESWANTH GADE Counsel for the Respondent No. 4: SRI SURAGANI VIJAYA KUMAR The Court made the following order: 1 APHC010503362024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) 0!¥i0 [3396] m WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26267/2024 Between; ...PETITIONER K Saheb Reddy AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.PULIPAT1 RADHIKA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.SURAGANI VIJAYA KUMAR 2,GP FOR COOPERATION 3.YASWANTH GADE The Court made the following; ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “ to issue a Writ, order or direction more particuiarly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents Nos.2 and 3 in not taking the Petitioner into service/re-instate the petitioner into service in pursuance of the orders of this Hon’ble Court passed in W.P No.24548 of 2023 Dt. 13.09.2024 as being illegal, irregular, arbitrary, contrary to the Orders 2 passed by this Hon’ble Court and consequently to direct the Respondent No. 2 and 3 to reinstate the Petitioner into service forthwith with all consequential benefits and pay the salaries from the date of Removal of Service i.e., 28.02.2017 till date of retirement in pursuance of the orders of this Hon’ble Court passed in W.P No.24548 of 2023 dated 13.09.2024 and pass such other order or orders " 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has preferred contempt case for implementation of the order passed W.P.No.24548 of 2023, dated 13.09.2024. In the light of filing of the in contempt case for implementation of the order passed in W.P.No.24548 of 2023, dated 13.09.2024, this petition may be disposed of. 3. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be order as to costs. no As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- P.VINOD KUMAR assistant registrar — SECTfON OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To 1. The Principal Secretary, Co-Operation Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Velagapudi, Guntur District, A.P 2. The District Co-Operative Officer, West Godavari, Andhra Pradesh. 3. The Chairman, Penumantra Large Sized Co-Operative Credit Society Ltd, Person-in-charge Committee, Penumantra, Penumantra Village, West Godavari. 4. The Member/Convener-cum-Chief Executive Officer, District Level Committee-cum-Appellate Authority, District Cooperative Central Bank Limited, West Godavari. 5. One CC to Sri. Pulipati Radhika Advocate [OPUC] 6. One CC to Sri. Yaswanth Gade Advocate [OPUC] 7. OneCCto Sri. Suragani Vijaya Kumar Advocate [OPUC] 8. Two CCs to GP for Cooperation, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 9. Three CD Copies GSC HIGH COURT DATED:30/04/2025 ORDER WP.No.26267 of 2024 ^ "v S Ot OCT 2925 ? ^ Currant ::ieciion . ^ .«9 DISPOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS