Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4465 (RAJ)

M/S OM BUILDERS AND M/S K. S. PROJECTS v. AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED

CW/1200/2025 of JOINT VENTURE (JV) · 2025-02-05

Sudesh Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:5035] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1200/2025 1. Joint Venture (Jv) Of M/s Om Builders And M/s K. S. Projects, Through Its Partner M/s K. S. Projects, Having Its Registered Office At 12-A, Radha Vihar - E, Ext. Kalwar Road, Hatoj, Jaipur - 302012 (Rajasthan). 2. M/s K. S. Projects, Partner Of Joint Venture Of M/s Om Builders And M/s K. S. Projects Through Its Proprietor Mr. Kaptan Singh, Having Registered Office At 12-A, Radha Vihar - E, Ext. Kalwar Road, Hatoj, Jaipur - 302012 (Rajasthan). ----Petitioners Versus 1. Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Through Managing Director, Having Office At Vidyut Bhawan, Panchsheel Nagar, Makarwali Road, Ajmer-305004. 2. Superintending Engineer (Tw), Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Registered Office Vidhyut Bhawan, Panchsheel Nagar, Makarwali Road, Ajmer-305004. 3. Superintending Engineer(Project), Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Registered Office Vidhyut Bhawan, Panchsheel Nagar, Makarwali Road, Ajmer-305004. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Yash Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 05/02/2025 1. Petitioners have invoked writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, impugning the order dated 02.01.2025 passed by the Superintending Engineer (TW), AVVNL, Ajmer, asking petitioner No.2 to deposit the balance recovery amount of Rs.7,89,4321/- under TN-407. [2025:RJ-JP:5035] (2 of 2) [CW-1200/2025] 2. Counsel for petitioners, after arguing the writ petition for some time and in view of fact that the dispute is contractual & factual, after obtaining instructions from the petitioners, seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition in order to raise his grievance before the Commercial Court. 3. Permission is granted. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty prayed for. 5. All pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin/43