- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5683 WP No. 110060 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M.G.UMA WRIT PETITION NO.110060 OF 2017 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: SMT. LAXMAVVA W/O. SIDDAPPA B. GOUDAR, AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK AND AGRICULTURE, R/O: CHIGADOLLI, TQ: GOKAK, DIST: BELAGAVI. …PETITIONER (BY SRI VINAY S.KOUJALAGI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. SONAWWA W/O. VENKATARAM HONAKUPPI, AGE: MAJOR, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: MALADINNI, TQ: GOKAK, DIST: BELAGAVI. 2. NIRUPADI S/O. VENKATARAM HONAKUPPI, AGE: MAJOR, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: MALADINNI, TQ: GOKAK, DIST: BELAGAVI. 3. SRI. BHIMAPPA SIDDAPPA HONAKUPPI, AGE: MAJOR, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: MALADINNI, TQ: GOKAK, DIST: BELAGAVI. 4. SRI. ARJUN SIDDAPPA HONAKUPPI, AGE: MAJOR, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: MALADINNI, TQ: GOKAK, DIST: BELAGAVI. Digitally signed by V N BADIGER Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5683 WP No. 110060 of 2017 5. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BELAGAVI. 6. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BAILHONGAL. 7. REVENUE INSPECTOR, GOKAK, TQ: GOKAK. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI T. HANUMAREDDY ADDL. GOVT. ADVOCATE FOR R5-R7; NOTICE TO R1 IS SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO; a) ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 21.02.2008 PASSED BY DEPUTY COMMISSIONER RESPONDENT NO.5 BELAGAVI IN RB/RTA/147/2007-08 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-F AND THE ORDER DATED 09.03.2007 PASSED BY ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER RESPONDENT NO.6 BAILHONGAL IN RTA/AP/78/2005-06 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-C IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC.,. THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M.G.UMA - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5683 WP No. 110060 of 2017 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M.G.UMA) 1. The order sheet dated 28.01.2025 reads as under: “Three week’s time is granted to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner to take steps in respect of deceased respondents No.2 to 4. If needful is not done by 17.03.2025, re-list this matter on 27.03.2025 for dismissal." 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he could not get any instructions from the petitioner regarding legal representatives of the deceased respondent Nos.2 to 4. 3. The petition against respondent Nos.2 to 4 is already abated. Respondent Nos.5 to 7 is Government represented by learned Additional Government Advocate. Notices issued to private respondents are not served. Hence, the petition is dismissed. Sd/- (M.G.UMA) JUDGE VB/ CT: UMD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18