[2025:RJ-JP:47442] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13230/2025 Rinku Son Of Shri Satish Kumar, Aged About 36 Years, Resident Of Kasba Tapukara, Tehsil Tapukara, District Khairthal-Tijara (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Alwar) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Girish Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 24/11/2025 1. This bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.252/2025 registered at Police Station C.P.S. Jaipur, District ACB District for offences punishable under Section 308(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (in short, ‘BNS’), 2023 and Sections 7A & 12 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (amended 2018). 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel contends that maximum allegation against the petitioner is that he received the bribe amount of Rs.30,000/- on behalf of public servant, who is co-accused. It is contended that trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. It is submitted that petitioner [2025:RJ-JP:47442] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13230/2025] is in custody since 25.09.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer for bail made by learned counsel for the petitioner. He submits that main accused of this case is still absconding. 4. Heard. Perused the material available on record. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, especially considering the material available on record as well as looking to the custody period, but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of this case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Rinku Son Of Shri Satish Kumar, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /64