Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44641 (AP)

M/S.MARUTHI CONSTRUCTIONS v. Y.SRILAKSHMI.I.A.S.

CC/1815/2023 · 2025-03-25

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1815 OF 2023 Contempt case U/s 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to punish the respondents herein for willfully violating and disobeying the Orders of the High Court dated 11/07/2022 in WP No. 1697/2022. Between: M/S.Maruthi Constructions, Rep by its Managing Partner B.Trivikram, S/o.BRK Murthy, Aged about 50 years, Occ. Contractor, R/o. D.No.54-14/1- 9/5, Bharathi Nagar, Vijayawada, Krishna District. ...PETITIONER AND 1. Y.Srilakshmi, I.A.S., The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Authority, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi. 2. Vivek Yadav, I.A.S., Andhra Pradesh Capital Region Development Authority, Rep. by its Commissioner, Lenin Center, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 3. Dhanunjaya, The Chief Engineer (HandB), The Andhra Pradesh Capital Region Development Authority, Lenin Center, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 4. M.Ganesh Babu, The Superintendent Engineer (HandB), The Andhra Pradesh Capital Region Development Authority, Lenin Center, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 5. Srinivas, The Executive Engineer (HandB), The Andhra Pradesh Capital Region Development Authority, Lenin Center, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 6. S.S. Rawath, I.A.S., The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Principal Secretary, Department of Finance and Planning, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi. ...RESPONDENTS/CONTEMNORS Counsel for the Petitioner; SRI UMA MAHESWARI KALAVA Counsel for the Respondents; SRI ASHOK RAM V Counsel for the Respondents; SRI KASA JAGAN MOHAN REDDY The Court made the following; APHC010137722023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] WEDNESDAY. THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1815/2023 Between: ...PETITIONER M/s.maruthi Constructions AND ...CONTEMNOR(S) Y Srilakshmi I A S and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: LUMA MAHESWARI KALAVA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1.ASHOKRAM V 2.KASA JAGANMOHAN REDDY 3. The Court made the following: ORDER The above contempt case is filed complaining non-implementation of the order dated 11.07.2022 in W.P.No.1697 of 2022. When the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that order in the writ petition has been complied with. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is Closed. No costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. M/s. Y.Srilakshmi.I.A.S. D . . , _ . The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Authority, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi. Andhra Pradesh Capital Region Development District Commissioner, Lenin Center, Vijayawada, Krishna 3. Sri Dhanunjaya, The Chief Engineer (HandB), The Andhra Pradesh Capital Region Development Authority, Lenin Center, Vijayawada Krishna District. Superintendent Engineer (HandB) The Andhra Pradesh Capital Region Development Authority, Lenin Center Vijayawada, Krishna District, ^^^^'■'.'^'vas. The Executive Engineer (HandB), The Andhra Pradesh Krishna Disthcf Authority, Lenin Center, Vijayawada, 6. Sri S.S. Rawath, I.A.S., The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Principal v“agap?;di Se'^^etariat Buildings, 7. One CC to Sri Uma Maheswari Kalava, Advocate [OPUC] 8. One CC to Sri Ashok Ram V, Advocate [OPUC] 9. One CC to Sri Kasa Jagan Mohan Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 10. Three CD Copies TF HIGH COURT DATED:26/03/2025 ORDER * 0 2 AUG 2025 JJ CC.No.1815 Of 2023 . Current Section CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE