Vejandla Naresh, v. Andhra Pradesh Central Power Distribution Company Limited,
WP/2192/2022 · 2025-03-26
Kiranmayee Mandava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4464 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4464 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 2192 OF 2022 Between: Vejandia Naresh, S/o. Rama Rao, Aged 36 years, Occ Shift Operator R/o. Ponduru Village, Tangutur Mandal, Prakasam District. ...Petitioner AND
1. Andhra Pradesh Central Power Distribution Company Limited, Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director, Corporate Office at Beside Polytechnic College, ITI Road, Vijayawada, Krishna District - 520008. 2. Superintending Engineer (Operation), Andhra Pradesh Central Power- Distribution Company Limited Ongole, Prakasam District. 3. The Executive Engineer, Andhra Pradesh Central Power Distribution Company Limited (Operations). Ongole, Prakasam District. 4. The Deputy Executive Engineer., Andhra Pradesh Central Power- Distribution Company Limited (Operations). Ongole, Prakasam District. 5. The Assistant Executive Engineer (Operations), APCPDCL, Tangutur Rural and Mandal, Prakasam District. 6. Dara Suresh, S/o. Not known. Aged 40 years, Occ Contractor, Proprietor of M/s. SR Electricals and Civil Works, R/o. H.No.36-95, Addanki Village and Mandal, Praksam District. ...Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents in not alibwing petitioner to attend to his duties as shift operator at 33/11 KV Substation, M.Nidamanuru Village, Tangutur Mandal, Prakasam District, under the control of respondents 3 to 5 with a view to engage new candidate of their choice, as illegal, irregular, irrational, without any sanction of law, violative of principles of natural justice, settled principles of jurisprudence and offends Articles 14, 16 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to allow petitioner to attend to his duties in the said post and pay him all such attendant benefits. may service lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to allow petitioner to attend to his duties as Shift Operator working at Electrical Sub-Station at M.Nidamanuru Village, Tangutur Mandal, Prakasam District and consequently direct the respondents to pay him all such attendant benefits, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: SRI Y NAGI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.2: M/S ADARSHITHA KILARU Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 3 to 5: SRI V R REDDY KOWURI SC FOR APCPDCL Counsel for the Respondent No.6: SRI SIVA SANKARA RAO BORRA The Court made the following order:
APHC010033312022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] ■ft:
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 2192 of 2022 Between: ...PETITIONER Vejandia Naresh AND ...RESPONDENT(S) Andhra Pradesh Central Power Distribution Company Limited and Others Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.Y NAGI REDDY 2.SIVA SANKARA RAO BORRA 3.ADARSHITHA KILARU 4.V R REDDY KOWURI (SC FOR APCPDCL) The Court made the following order:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, they have addressed a letter to the Registry dated 25.03.2025, which is placed on record, seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed.
Sd/-M SRINIVAS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// N OFFICER SE To,
1. One CC to M/s. Nimmagadda Revathi Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri. Y Nagi Reddy Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri. Siva Sankara Rao Borrra Advocate [OPUC] One CC to M/s Adarshitha Kilaru Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri. V R Reddy Kovvuri SC for APCPDCL [OPUC Three CD Copies
2.
3.
4.
5.
6. GSC
HIGH COURT DATED:26/03/2025
ORDER WP.No.2192 of 2022 DISMISSING OF THE WP AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS