Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44633 (PNJ)

MAHENDER SINGH v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/10706/2025 · 2025-04-21

Deepinder Singh Nalwa, Sudhir Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 145 CWP-10706-2025 (O&M) Date of decision : 21.04.2025 MAHENDER SINGH ...... Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA *** Present :- Mr. Ajit Malik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG, Haryana with Mr. Karan Jindal, AAG, Haryana for the respondent-State. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate with Ms. Saanvi Singla, Advocate and Ms. Sharvi Dadhwal, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 4-HSVP. *** SUDHIR SINGH , J. (Oral) By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner has sought issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari for quashing clause No.5 and 6 of the allotment letter dated 16.11.2024 (Annexure P-24), thereby calling upon the petitioner to deposit an amount of Rs.2,79,43,380/- i.e. the current reserve price of the year 2024-2025. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of his grievance, the petitioner shall approach the competent authority by filing an appropriate representation. RIMPAL RANI 2025.04.25 16.46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-10706-2025 :2: 3. Served with the advance copy of the petition, Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG, Haryana, is present in Court for respondent No.1 and Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 4 and submit that if, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the same shall be considered and decided by the competent authority, in accordance with law. 4. Without commenting on merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate representation before the competent authority-respondent No.2 (The Chief Administrator, Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran Sector-6, Panchkula). In case, any such representation is filed, the respondent No.2 shall look into the same and pass an appropriate reasoned order thereon, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of filing/receipt of such representation. 5. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA) JUDGE 21.04.2025 Rimpal Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether Reportable : No RIMPAL RANI 2025.04.25 16.46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document