HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7141/2024 Ravinder Khasa S/o Shri Dayachand, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 1/78 Flat No. G2, Surya Apartment, Chitrakoot, Jaipur (West) Rajasthan, Permanent Address Baroda Thothan, Sonipath, Haryana. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P 2. Additional Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur ( East). 3. Deputy Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur ( East). 4. S.H.O., Police Station Chitrakoot, District Jaipur. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 281/2024 Ankit Sharma S/o Sh. Anil Sharma, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Rz-93/49, Madan Puri West, Sagarpur, Street No. 7, New Delhi-110046. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Ravindra Khasa S/o Sh. Dayachand Khasa, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Baroda Thothan Sonipat (Hr). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajeev Kumar Sharma Mr. Brahma Prakash For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary-PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 03/12/2025 1. The S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 281/2024 has been submitted by the accused petitioner praying for quashing (2 of 3) [CRLMP-7141/2024] the proceedings arising out of the impugned FIR No. 295/2022 registered with the Police Station, Chitrakoot, Jaipur City (West) for the offence under Sections 384, 504 and 506 IPC and Sections 66-C and 66-D of the IT Act, on the basis of the compromise between the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that after registration of the aforesaid FIR, the complainant-respondent has submitted a compromise in favour of the petitioner before the Investigating Officer, hence the proceedings arising out of the impugned FIR be quashed on the basis of the aforesaid compromise. 3. Per contra, counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant opposes the arguments raised by counsel for the petitioner and submits that no compromise has taken place between the parties and the complainant is willing to prosecute the petitioner, that is why he has approached this Court by way of filing S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition no. 7141/2024 seeking directions to the Investigating Officer for conducting fair and impartial investigation. Counsel submits that the contents of the allegations levelled in the impugned FIR reveals commission of a cognizable offence, therefore the petition submitted by the accused petitioner is liable to be rejected. 4. Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on record. 5. The sole basis on which the S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No.281/2024 has been filed by the accused petitioner is the compromise, which is disputed by counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant. Hence under these circumstances, the petition (3 of 3) [CRLMP-7141/2024] cannot be entertained in terms of the compromise and the proceedings arising out of impugned FIR cannot be quashed, as there is no compromise between the parties. 6. Accordingly, the criminal misc. petition No. 281/2024 stand dismissed. 7. Looking to the fact that the investigation pertaining to the impugned FIR No. 295/2022 is still lying pending, it is expected from the Investigating Officer to make all possible endeavours to speed up the investigation of the aforesaid FIR by conducting a fair and impartial investigation and submit the conclusion report of the investigation before the Competent Court of Law, as early as possible. 8. Accordingly, the Criminal Misc. Petition No. 7141/2024 also stands dismissed. 9. Stay applications and all pending application(s), if any, also stand dismissed. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/90-91