KANSHDAR NISHAD AND 31 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
A482/22386/2017 · 2025-05-20
Prashant Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44629 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44629 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:86232 Court No. - 87 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 22386 of 2017 Applicant :- Kanshdar Nishad And 31 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Shiva Kant Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- Atul Kumar Kushwaha,G.A. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
1. None appeared on behalf of the applicants to press this application even in the revised reading of cause list.
2. The instant applicant has been filed way back in the year 2017. It appears that by efflux of time either the applicant has lost interest in the matter or the instant application has rendered infructuous, and that is why no one has appeared on behalf of the applicants to press this application.
3. Accordingly, the instant application is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
4. However, in case the cause for filing the instant application is still surviving, the applicants will be at liberty to file restoration application in the instant matter. Order Date :- 21.5.2025 Manish Himwan Digitally signed by :- MANISH HIMWAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad