SRI. CHANAGOUDA YALLNGOUDA PATIL SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS v. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
WP/102702/2024 · 2025-02-25
Suraj Govindaraj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44624 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44624 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:3852 WP No. 102702 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 102702 OF 2024 (LA-RES) BETWEEN:
1. SRI. CHANAGOUDA YALLNGOUDA PATIL SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS
KUMARAGOUDA S/O CHANAGOUDA PATIL AGE. 46 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. VAKKUND TQ. BAILHONGAL DIST. BELAGAVI
2. SHRI SHIVANGOUDA BASANGOUDA HULEPPANAVAR AGE. 72 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. VAKKUND TQ. BAILHONGAL DIST. BELAGAVI
3. SHRI CHANABASAGOUDA S/O GOUDAPPA PATIL AGE. 68 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. VAKKUND TQ. BAILHONGAL DIST. BELAGAVI
4. DODAPPA BAILAPPA KOTAGI SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS
DUNDAPPA S/O DODDAPPA KOTAGI AGE. 55 YEARS,
Digitally signed by GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:3852 WP No. 102702 of 2024
OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. VAKKUND TQ. BAILHONGAL DIST. BELAGAVI
5. SHIVAPPAGOUDA S/O RUDRAGOUDA PATIL AGE. 48 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. VAKKUND TQ. BAILHONGAL DIST. BELAGAVI
6. VIRUPAXAPPA SHRISHAILAPPA SANNAHOOLI SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS
SHRISHAILAPPA S/O VIRUPAXAPPA SANNAHOOLI AGE. 62 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. VAKKUND TQ. BAILHONGAL DIST. BELAGAVI
7. NAGAPPA MALLAPPA KOLAKAR SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS
MAHANTHESH S/O NAGAPPA KOLAKAR AGE. 38 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. VAKKUND TQ. BAILHONGAL DIST. BELAGAVI
8. GANGAPPA BASAPPA NAVALAGI SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS
SIDDAPPA S/O GANGAPPA NAVALAGI ALIAS HADAPAD AGE. 64 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. VAKKUND TQ. BAILHONGAL DIST. BELAGAVI …PETITIONERS
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:3852 WP No. 102702 of 2024
(BY SRI. OMKAR LAXMAN DESAI,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER MALAPRABHA PROJECT-III, BAGALKOT DIST. BAGALKOT
2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KARNATAKA NEERAVARI NIGAM LIMITED MLBC DIVISION NO.2, NAVILUTHEERTH TQ. SAUNDATTI DIST. BELAGAVI
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. V.S. KALASURMATH, AGA FOR R1;
SRI. M.B. KANAVI., ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER ORDER OR DIRECTIONS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.1 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 10- 08-2018 VIDE ANNEXURE-C AND PAY THE DAMAGES/COMPENSATION AMOUNT FROM THE DATE OF TAKING POSSESSION TILL THE DATE OF 4(1) NOTIFICATION IN RESPECT OF SY.NO.73/1 PLUS 2+3+4/B MEASURING 30 GUNTAS, SY.NO.
161 MEASURING 20 GUNRTAS SY.NO.52/1 MEASURING 10 GUNTAS, SY.NO.25/1+2A+2B/1+2 MEASURING 10 GUNTAS, SY.NO.48/2 MEASURING 22 GUNTAS, SY.NO.45/2A+2B MEASURING 10 GUNTAS, SY.NO.54/0 MEASURING 15 GUNTAS AND SY.NO.51/3B MEASUIRNG 06 GUNTAS TO THE PETITIONERS RESPECTIVELY WITH ALL CONSEQUENTIAL BENEFITS TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION SIMILAR DAMAGES/AWARDS PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT IN THE ENDS OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC. THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) * Corrected vide court order dated 05.08.2025
Sd/- SGRJ
- 4 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:3852 WP No. 102702 of 2024
1. The petitioners are before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: a. Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other order or directions directing the R1 to consider the representation dated: 10.08.2018 vide Annexure-C and pay the damages/compensation amount from the date of taking possession till the date of 4(1) Notification in respect of Sy.No.73/1+2+3+4/B measuring 30 guntas, Sy.No.161 measuring 20 guntas, Sy.No.52/1 measuring 10 guntas, Sy.No.25/1+2A+2B/1+2 measuring 10guntas, Sy.No. 48/2 Measuring 22 guntas, y.No.45/2A+2B measuring 10 guntas, Sy.No. 54/0 measuring 15 guntas and Sy.No.51/3B measuring 06 guntas to the petitioners respectively with all consequential benefits taking into
consideration similar damages/awards passed by the 1st Respondent in the ends of justice and equity.
b. Issue a writ of Mandamus or any directions, directing R1 to pay additional interest by way of damages, at the rate of 15% per annum from the period between taking possession till 4(1) Notification as held by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Balwan Sing and Others vs. LAO and others, AIR 2016 SC 1565.
c. Issue a writ of Mandamus or any directions, directing the Respondents to pay interest for the delayed payment period, in the ends of justice and equity.
d. Any other relief as deemed fit in the facts and circumstances of the case in the ends of justice and equity.
- 5 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:3852 WP No. 102702 of 2024
2. Petitioners claim to be the owners of the various lands which were acquired for the purpose of Malaprabha Reservoir Project and award has been passed on 30.07.2009 granting certain compensation, which compensation was enhanced by the Reference Court.
3. The petitioners claim that even before the acquisition proceedings were completed, possession of lands of the petitioners were taken by respondents depriving the petitioners of income from the said properties and as such representation was submitted on 10.08.2018 for grant of damages/award.
4. Sri.M.B.Kanavi, learned counsel for the respondent No.2 however contends that the possession was not taken over prior to the acquisition being completed and as such, no damages/award of similar amount would have to be paid in favour of the petitioners.
5. A representation is submitted by the petitioners on 10/08/2018, the fact remains that no order has been
- 6 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:3852 WP No. 102702 of 2024
passed thereon. Even if, the respondents have good ground on merits, it was for the respondents to pass an
order on the said representation either accepting or rejecting the representation.
6. Needless to say that, if the representation is rejected, the same would be accompanied by reasons.
7. In that view of the matter, reserving liberty to the petitioners and respondents to agitate all the issues before respondent No.1, petition stands disposed of.
8. Respondent No.1 shall pass necessary orders within 60 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this
order.
SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
LN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 0