C.R.P. 346/2024 p. 1 $~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.R.P. 346/2024 (Disposed of case) OMWATI RAGHAV .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Kannupriya Paliwal, Advocate. versus PRAVEEN AWANA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Puran Chand & Ms. Anita Chahal, Advocates. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN O R D E R % 28.11.2025 REVIEW PET. 465/2025 (for review of the judgment dated 14.07.2025) 1. The revision petitioner seeks review of the judgment dated 14.07.2025, by which the captioned revision petition was dismissed. Ms. Kannupriya Paliwal, learned counsel for the review petitioner, submits that in the judgment under review, the Court has misunderstood the ratio of the judgment of the Supreme Court in Suraj Lamp & Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Haryana & Anr., (2012) 1 SCC 656, [hereinafter, “Suraj Lamp”] and has also misinterpreted Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. 2. A perusal of the judgment under review shows that both Suraj Lamp and Section 53A were noticed by the Court and discussed. In my view, therefore, the case does not fall within the review jurisdiction of the This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/12/2025 at 14:05:18 C.R.P. 346/2024 p. 2 Court, which arises only if there is an error apparent on the face of the record. Such jurisdiction cannot be invoked merely on the contention that the analysis of authorities or interpretation of statute is erroneous. 3. For the aforesaid reasons, the review petition is dismissed. PRATEEK JALAN, J NOVEMBER 28, 2025 ‘pv/JM’/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/12/2025 at 14:05:18