APHC010219652016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 44503/2016 Between: 1. M/S. RAJA SERVICE STATION, INDIAN OIL CORPORATION DEALER, KESAVARAOPETA, S.M.PURAM POST SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, K.RAMAKRISHNA S/O.NARSAIAH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM, SHASTRI BHAVAN, NEW DELHI-110 001 2. THE INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS SENIOR DIVISIONAL RETAIL SALES MANAGER 8TH FLOOR, LIC BUILDING, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530 004. 3. THE SALES OFFICER, INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED, SRIKAKULAM SALES AREA, SRIKAKULAM - 532 001 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not restoring the supply of MS and HSD to the petitioner outlet for the purpose of sale to its customers pursuant to the analyst report of the laboratory incharge, Chief Manager, (Quality Control laboratory) Indian oil Corporation ltd., Visakha 2 JS,J W.P.No.44503/2016 terminal dated 21.09.2015 and also to declare the action of the respondents in not considering the representations dated 18.02.2016 , 12.03.2016 and 01.12.2016 submitted by the petitioner for the supply of MS and HSD as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents continue to supply MS and HSD to the petitioner and to pass such other order or orders as this Honble Court may deems fit just and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 54903 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to supply MS and HSD to the petitioner retail outlet forthwith pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A PRABHAKAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA 2. K A NARASIMHAM 3. T BALA MOHAN REDDY 4. VENKATA DURGA RAO ANANTHA 3 JS,J W.P.No.44503/2016 The Court made the following ORDER: No representation for the petitioner. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the petitioners have filed W.P.No.26413 of 2017 challenging the termination orders passed on 18.07.2017. Hence, no further orders are required in this writ petition. Perused the record. Since the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 12.11.2025 KAS 4 JS,J W.P.No.44503/2016 246 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 44503/2016 Dated: 12.11.2025 KAS