Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44618 (PNJ)

UNNI KRISHNA PILLAI v. SHEENA SASIDHARAN AND OTHERS

CRR(F)/384/2020 · 2025-01-28

Namit Kumar

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE 201 Unni Krishna Pil Sheena Sasidhara CORAM : HON Present: Mr. for t Mr. for *** NAMIT KUMA 1. Lear settled between 04.01.2025 has b 2. In v stands disposed o 3. Ho terms and conditi 4. Pend January 28, 202 Pankaj* THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH CRR-F No Date of De na Pillai Versus sidharan and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT Mr. Nitin Sachdeva, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Viren Jain, Advocate or the respondents. *** UMAR, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the parties are tween the parties. A photocopy o has been produced, which is taken on In view of the aforesaid comprom osed of. owever, it is made clear that the conditions of the said compromise dee Pending application(s), if any, also s , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable NJAB AND HARYANA AT ARH F No.384 of 2020 (O&M) e of Decision:28.01.2025 ... Petitioner ... Respondents AMIT KUMAR s are ad idem that the matter has been opy of the compromise deed dated ken on record. mpromise deed, the instant petition at the parties shall be bound by the se deed. , also stand disposed of. (NAMIT KUMAR) JUDGE ned : Yes/No : Yes/No s s been dated ion by the PANKAJ KUMAR 2025.01.28 18:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh