1 APHC010054112018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 2398/2018 Between: Madhu Kiran and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. POLANKI ANAND SURYA 2. SRINIVASA RAO MADIRAJU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “…..to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring that a) Petitioners are entitled to the benefit of Para-4 of G.O.Ms.No.6, dated.30.4.2015. b) not extending the said benefit is in violative of Article 14.16.21 and 300(A) of the Constitution of India. c) further declare that petitioners are entitled to pay fixation in the Revised Pay Scales of 2015 given the benefit of fitment which was extended to all other Government employees who were in receipt of pre Revised Scales of Pay and 2 not extending the same to the petitioners is illegal and arbitrary. d) and pass such other order or orders…...” 2. Heard Sri M.Srinivasa Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for School Education, appearing for the respondents. 3. During hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the matter is squarely covered by the common order passed by this Court in W.P.Nos.3735 of 2018 and batch, dated 25.03.2025, and hence, requests this Court to pass similar order in this petition also. The operative portion of the said order is as follows:- “4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petitions are disposed of directing the Government to consider the representation dated 22.12.2017 of the Petitioners relating to their claim of fitment vide Para No.4 of G.O.Ms.No.46 dated 30.04.2015 and take appropriate decision according to governing Rules and Law, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order…..” 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for School Education, appearing for the respondents does not refute the said submission. 5. Considering the submissions made, this Writ Petition is also disposed of in terms of the common order passed in W.P.Nos.3735 of 2018 and batch, dated 25.03.2025. There shall be no order as to costs. 3 6. The Registry is directed to attach a copy of the common order passed in W.P.Nos.3735 of 2018 and batch, dated 25.03.2025, to this order. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 25.04.2025 ARR 4 53 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 2398/2018 Dt.25.04.2025 ARR