NIPPON STEERING AND SUSPENSION PVT LTD v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CWP/10490/2025 · 2025-04-09
Sudhir Singh, Sukhvinder Kaur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44613 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44613 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-10490-2025 (O&M)
134 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Nippon Steering and Suspension Pvt. Ltd. State of Haryana
CORAM: HON
HON
Present:- Mr. Mr. Munish Sharma, Advocate and
Mr. Rahul, Advocate
Mr. Anku Mittal, Additional AG Haryana with
Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG Haryana and
Mr. Karan Jindal, AAG Haryana
Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate,
Ms. Kushaldeep Kaur, Advocate,
Ms. Saanvi Singla, Advocate and
Ms. Sharni Dadhwal, Advocate
SUDHIR SINGH
Present nature of Mandamus payable by the petitioner after deciding representation dated 17.01.2025 (Annexure P-15) hereinabove, and further to direct him to send the outstanding due 21.06.2024 to respondent No.4. 2. At the outset, l petitioner would be satisfied, in case, 2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH Nippon Steering and Suspension Pvt. Ltd. versus Haryana and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR Mr. Shailendra Jain, Senior Advocate Mr. Munish Sharma, Advocate and Mr. Rahul, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anku Mittal, Additional AG Haryana with Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG Haryana and Mr. Karan Jindal, AAG Haryana Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate, Ms. Kushaldeep Kaur, Advocate, Ms. Saanvi Singla, Advocate and Ms. Sharni Dadhwal, Advocate for ***** SUDHIR SINGH, J. (ORAL) Present petition herein, inter alia, andamus directing respondent No.3 to decide the outstanding dues payable by the petitioner after deciding representation dated 17.01.2025 15) of the petitioner raising demands for waiver/ set off as stated hereinabove, and further to direct him to send the outstanding due respondent No.4. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner would be satisfied, in case, its 1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-10490-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: April 09, 2025 ….Petitioner ….Respondents SUDHIR SINGH SUKHVINDER KAUR Advocate with Mr. Munish Sharma, Advocate and for the petitioner. Mr. Anku Mittal, Additional AG Haryana with Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG Haryana and Mr. Karan Jindal, AAG Haryana for the respondent – State and Ms. Kushaldeep Kaur, Advocate, Ms. Saanvi Singla, Advocate and for the respondent – HSIIDC.
, is for issuance of a Writ in the No.3 to decide the outstanding dues payable by the petitioner after deciding representation dated 17.01.2025 the petitioner raising demands for waiver/ set off as stated hereinabove, and further to direct him to send the outstanding dues calculated till earned counsel for the petitioner submits that its pending representation dated
2
2025 (O&M) , 2025 Petitioner s in the No.3 to decide the outstanding dues payable by the petitioner after deciding representation dated 17.01.2025 the petitioner raising demands for waiver/ set off as stated s calculated till earned counsel for the petitioner submits that representation dated MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.04.11 16:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment
CWP-10490-2025 (O&M)
2 of 2
17.01.2025 (Annexure P-15) is decided by respondent No.3, which has not been adverted to by the respondents till date. 3. On the other hand, on advance service of copy of petition, learned counsel for the respondents appears and opposes issuance of notice of motion. He submits that grievance of the petitioner will be looked into by respondent No.3 and it shall take decision either way, on pending representation dated 17.01.2025 (Annexure P-15) of the petitioner. 4. Given the nature of order being passed, there is no necessity to seek reply by any of the respondents as no further proceedings and/or pleadings are required. 5. Without commenting on merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to consider pending representation dated 17.01.2025 (Annexure P-15) of the petitioner, and pass an appropriate reasoned
order, in accordance with law, at the earliest, preferably within a period of 04 weeks from the date of receipt of copy/ production of this order.
6.
Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(SUDHIR SINGH)
JUDGE
(SUKHVINDER KAUR)
JUDGE April 09, 2025 mahavir
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether reportable:
Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.04.11 16:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment