PURNIMA CHAKRABORTY & ANR v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS
WPA/23289/2019 · 2025-09-01
Partha Sarathi Chatterjee
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44611 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44611 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
26
01.09. 2025
Ct. No. 07
Ab
WPA 23289 of 2019
Smt. Purnima Chakraborty and another Vs. The State of West Bengal and others. ---------------
1. No one appears in support of the writ petition, when the matter is called on.
2. Alleging inaction on the part of the concerned bank in considering the petitioners’ reply to the notice issued against them under Section 13(2) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, the present writ petition has been preferred.
3. I am of the view that with the passage of time, the present writ petition has become infructuous and the same is, accordingly, dismissed.
4. There shall, however, be no order as to costs.
(Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.)
2