Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4461 (HP)

RAJEEV KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

EX.P./2325/2025 · 2026-08-27

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Ex. Pet No.2325 of 2025 Decided on: 27.08.2026 _________________________________________________________________ Rajeev Kumar and Anr. ....Petitioners Versus State of HP and Ors …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioners: Ms. Bheeshamlata, Advocate vice Mr. Mandeep Chandel, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr.Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Y.P.S.Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Learned Additional Advocate General has handed over bank drafts in the sum of Rs.2500/-, drawn in the name of each of the petitioners in terms of costs imposed in the previous order, to their learned counsel. 2. Learned Additional Advocate General has also placed on record office instructions dated nil of August 2026 from the Director of School Education, conveying as under:- “In this regard, it is submitted that the claim of 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes - 2 - the petitioner Shivani Sharma, JBT, E/B Jhandutta has been considered and budget amounting to Rs. 79002/- (Rupees Seventy Nine Thousand Two only) has been sanctioned in his favour vide Sanction Letter No. 237- 220-082026 Dated 06/08/2026 under Head of Accounts 08-2202-01-101-01-SOON-01-SALARY (copy enclosed). The said budget has been allocated to the Block Elementary Education Officer, Jhandutta DDO Code 206-BEEO Jhandutta for its disbursement to the petitioner. The bill is being prepared by the BEEO Jhandutta and will be submitted to the Treasury Officer, Jhandutta for passing very shortly.” 3. Let the needful be done by the respondents by crediting the amount, due to the petitioners, in their respective bank accounts within two weeks from today. This execution petition is accordingly disposed of. Liberty, however, is reserved to the petitioners to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of their surviving grievances, if any, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge August 27, 2026 R.Atal