Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44609 (AP)

P. Chandra Reddy, v. V. Sobha Rani,

SA/769/2005 · 2025-02-27

T Mallikarjuna Rao

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVAfe^ FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 998 AND 769 OF 2005 SECOND APPEAL NO: 998 OF 2005 Appeal under section 100 of CPC, against the judgment and decree in A.S.No.108 of 2004 in the Court of principal District Judge, Kurnool dated 10-3-2005 in which the judgment and decree in O.S.No. 106 of 2003 passed by the Additional Civil (Senior Division) Judge, Kurnool dated 7-9- 2004. Between: P.Chandra Reddy, S/o P.Ranga Reddy, Hindu, aged about 31 years Business R/o Kurnool. ...Appellant (Respondent - Plaintiff) AND V. Shobha Rani, W/o Vagadandia Siva Reddy, Hindu, 36 years, Tailoring Centre, R/o H.no.12-B-5-10-16, Bhadrinadhanagar, Behind Raghunatha Talkies, Kallur village, Kurnool Taluk & District. ...Respondent (Appellant - Defendant) Counsel for the Appellant :SRI. M N NARASIMHA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: SREEKANTH second appeal NO: 769 OF 7nn<; REDDY AMBATI I ■=5 ' Appeal under section 100 of CPC, against the judgment and decree in A.S.No.107 of 2004 in the Court of principal District Judge dated 10-3-2005 in which the judgment and decree i passed by the Additional Civil (Senior Division) Judge 2004. Kurnool in O.S.No. 22 of 2004 V Kurnool dated 7-9- Between: P.Chandra Reddy, S/o P.Ranga Reddy Business R/o H.No.49-50-A-179, Sreeramnagar, Kurnool. ...Appellant (Respondent - Plaintiff) Hindu, aged about 31 years AND V. Shobha Rani, W/o Vagadandia Tailoring Centre, R/o H.no.12-e-5-10-16, Bhadrinadhanagar, Behind Raghunatha Talkies, Kallur village, Kurnool Taluk & Siva Reddy, Hindu, 36 years District. ...Respondent (Appellant - Defendant) Counsel for the Appellant :SRI. M N NARASIMHA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: SRI. SREEKANTH The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER REDDY AMBATI 1 APHC010476152005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 998/2005 Between: ...APPELLANT P.Chandra Reddy AND ...RESPONDENT V Shobha Rani Counsel for the Appellant: 1. M N NARASIMHA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: 1.SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI r--"- 2 APHC010488232005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 769/2005 Between: ...APPELLANT P. Chandra Reddy AND ...RESPONDENT V Sobha Rani Counsel for the Appellant: 1.M N NARASIMHA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: 1.SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI The Court made the following common Judgment: The Second Appeal is preferred by the appellant against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2005, passed in A.S.Nos.107 of 2004 and 108 of 2004, on the file of the Principal District Judge, Kurnool. The learned counsel for the respondent is present. 2. 3 On 03.02.2025, upon being represented by the learned counsel for the appellant that, he had no instructions from the appellant, this Court ordered notice to the appellant. The notice was sent to the appellant but returned served with an endorsement ‘appellant deceased’. 3. un- 4. Despite the best efforts by this Court, the notice was not served on the appellant and it appears that the legal representatives of the appellant are not interested to come on record to prosecute the matter. Hence, this Court has no other alternative but to dismiss the appeal. 5. Accordingly, the Second Appeals are dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this appeal shall stand closed. Sd/-K.TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR M //TRUE COPY// /kr SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The principal District Judge (with records) 2. The Additional Civil (Senior Division) Judge, Kurnool (with records) 3. One CC to SRI. M N Narasimha Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to SRI. Sreekanth Reddy Ambati, Advocate [OPUC] 5. The Section Officer, V R Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. 6. Three CD Copies PR HIGH COURT DATED:28/02/2025 ORDER SECOND APPEAL NO: 998 AND 769 OF 2005 DISMISSING THE APPEAL’S FOR DEFAULT