RAM PRAKASH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU SECY. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/41005/2013 · 2025-09-21
Amitabh Kumar Rai, Saral Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44603 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44603 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 41005 of 2013 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J.
HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J.
1. List has been revised.
2. Nobody has appeared on behalf of petitioner to press the writ petition.
3. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. September 22, 2025 Mohit Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Raj Kumar, Sanjeev Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.P. Paul (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Ram Prakash .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Secy. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHIT KUMAR KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad