Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44599 (AP)

B KANCHANAMMA v. SRI DR VENKATESH IAS

CC/2760/2025 · 2025-12-23

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010503722025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2760/2025 Between: 1. B KANCHANAMMA, W/O.B.GOVINDA REDDY, AGED 74 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.2-87, T.K.PURAM, MUDIYURU, PITCHATUR, KOTAMANGAPURAM, CHITTOOR-517587. ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. S.GOVINDAMMA,, W/O.LATE VENKATA REDDY, AGED 68 YEARS, R/O. 1-62/A, T.K.PURAM NEW MYDIYURU, PITCHATUR, KOTAMANGAPURAM, CHITTOOR-517587, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. SRI DR VENKATESH IAS, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT AT PRESENT TIRUPATI DISTRICT AT TIRUPATI. 2. SRI K V NAGENDRAKUMAR, THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, TIRUPATI. 3. SRI T V SUBRAMANYAM, THE MANDAL THREE MEN COMMITTEE, HEADED BY THE TAHSILDAR, PITCHATUR MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 4. SRI YUGANDHAR RAJU, THE MANDAL EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, PITCHATUR MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 5. SRI SUBRAMANYAM HEAD MASTER, THE M.P.P. SCHOOL, T.K.PURAM VILLAGE, PITCHATUR MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 6. SMT A KANAKA, W/O.YELUMALAIAH, CHAIRMAN, PARENTS 2 COMMITTEE OF MPP SCHOOL, T.K.PURAM VILLAGE, PITCHATUR MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents No.1 to 6/Respondents No.3 to 8 herein who are intentionally violated the order DT 06-01-2025 passed in WP No.31257 of 2024 by the Hon'ble Sri Justice Tarlada Rajasekhar Garu and there by all of you dis-obeyed the Order and praying you to punish for committing contempt of Court Orders by holding all of you personally responsible for the costs and consequence thereof as per Article 215 of the Constitution of India, besides Section 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. PARIMI RAMA RAYUDU Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. RAMA CHANDRA RAO GURRAM The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.2760 of 2025 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners stated that the order in W.P.No.31257 of 2024 dated 06.01.2025 has been complied with. Recording the said submission, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 24.12.2025 KBN 4 16 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Contempt Case No.2760 of 2025 24.12.2025 KKBBNN