SMT. P. VARALAMMA, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DIST. v. THE COMMISSIONER FOR CO-OP., HYDERABAD, & ANR.
WP/36835/2012 · 2025-03-20
K Manmadha Rao
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44598 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44598 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HON’BLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 36835 OF 2019 Between; Smt P. Varalamma, W/o. G. Vakalarao, Occ: Assistant General Manager (under suspension), R/o:24-216-217,C/o:Sodessetti BalajiRao, Advocate oSctTp 52“ooV^ Showroom, Ramanaidupet, Machlipatnam, Krishna ...PETITIONER AND
1. The Commissioner for Co.operation and Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.
2. The Chief Executive Officer and Disciplinary Authority, The Krishna Corporation Central Bank Ltd., Jagendrapuram, Machilipatnam No.32, Krishna Dist., AP. P.O ...RESPONDENT No.1&2 of India praying that in may more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari and quash the Proceeding on the suggestion of the Respondent NO. 1-The Commissioner for Co-operative and Registrar of Co-operative Societies vide Ref.No.;527/Estt/2012/13 issued by the Respondent No.2 Chief Executive ‘ Authority issued on suggestion of the Respondent No.1 Proceedings of the Respondent No.2 as illegal and unconstitution al. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue a writ order or direction dated 12.10.2012 Officer/ Disciplinary by declaring the
l-A. NO: 2 OF 2012(WPMP. NO: 467fi4 OF 9ni9| P^ion under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the lircumstanees stated in the affidavit filed i r<:' in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings issued by the Respondent No.2 Chief Executive Officer/ Disciplinary Authority on the suggestion of the RespcDrtdent No. 1-The Proceeding Commissioner for Co- vide Ref.No.;527/Estt / Petition. operative and Registrar of Co-operative Societies 2012 /13 dated 12.10.2012 till the disposal of the Writ Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M KALYANA RAMA KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following: OFtDER
APHC010754682012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3310] FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 36835/2012 Between: Smt. P. Varalamma, Machilipatnam, Krishna Dist. ...PETITIONER AND The Commissioner For Coop Hyderabad Anr and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.M KALYANA RAMA KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GPFOR COOPERATION The Court made the following:
ORDER: Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, none appeared for the petitioner. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents is present.
is observed that, this Court
2. On verifying the proceeding sheet, it vide order dated 30.04.2013, while issuing Ruie Nisi, granted interim direction as under:
'WPMP No.46754 of 2012 dated 18 04 2012 was issued to the petitioner alleging that certain and that she should have noticed about most funds of the branch, if not all and she Nodal Officer, it is her primary duty to The memo l, irregularities committed in the Accounts branch of the irregularities and misappropriation of he According to the pedtioner, she is working - ^nd'fSed'to unearthed and deteoted about the the amount of RsTaO °37??was uneaSrHe" main contention is that the whole of the misappropriation unearthed basing upon her complaint. AS seen from the Order djed f
“ Commissioner for CooP^ati°n & ific pEegaris^de^^S.^^^^^^^^ RrNolwGTndS?1-12 dated 06.03.2012 revealed that the petitioner has Informed about the irregularities. has was have It is were ,he above oiroumstanoes, Stt^de Setrta.?he%°e"^ enguiry initiated against the petitioner may go on is of the view that,, already orders and continue the further orders are required However, if at all any grievance avail the remedy available to him under perusal of the same, this Court is direction to the respondents to pass petitioner n service. Therefore, it appears that no to be passed for further adjudication, subsists, the petitioner is at liberty to
3. On a there is a law.
4. With the above observation, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
5. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed.
Sd/- A VIJAYA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, PradeshTly'Srabad^°'^ Co-operative Societies, Government of Andhra Krishna No.32, Krishna Dist, ’ Machilipatnam, P.O
3. One CC ot Sri M Kalyana Rama Krishna Advocate [OPUC]
4. Two CCS ot GP for Cooperation, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
5. Three CD Copies TF vna
\ HIGH COURT DATED:21/03/2025
ORDER WP.No.36835 of 2012 I disposing of the W.P., WITHOUT COSTS I