Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44595 (RAJ)

M/S SHRI BALAJI AND SONS v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/14969/2025 · 2025-10-30

Ashutosh Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:43570] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14969/2025 M/s Shri Balaji And Sons, Through Proprietor Shri Mahipal Choudhary, Having Place Of Business At Nh-52, Village- Dhodsar, Behind Govind Dairy, Tehsil- Chomu, District- Jaipur, 303712. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary Mines And Geology, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariate, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Mines And Geology Department, Udaipur, Rajasthan. 3. The Superintendent Mining Engineer, Jaipur Office At Fifth Floor, Khanij Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur. 4. The Assistant Mining Engineer, Jaipur Office At Fifth Floor, Khanij Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Anubha Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG with Mr. Priyam Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Rohit Tiwari, AGC Mr. Vivek Guwlani, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 30/10/2025 1. This petition has been filed with the following prayer:- a. Issue an appropriate order and/or direction quashing the letter dated 16.07.2025 (Annexure-3) issued by Respondent No.4 and direct the Respondents not to pass any adverse orders against the Petitioner without following due process of law and various office circulars/orders issued by the Department; and b. To direct the Respondent No. 3 to activate issuance of e-ravanna of the Petitioner. [2025:RJ-JP:43570] (2 of 2) [CW-14969/2025] c. Pass any other order and/or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case." 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have issued a show cause notice dated 16.07.2025 (Annexure-3) and have not supplied copies of the order and documents relied upon by them to the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner is not able to reply to the said show cause notice and the respondents are bent upon to pass adverse order against the petitioner. Hence, learned counsel prays that the respondents be enjoined from passing any adverse order against the petitioner without giving any proper opportunity of submiting reply to the said notice. 3. In that view of the matter, the respondents are directed to dispose of the show cause notice dated 16.07.2025 in accordance with law after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 4. With the above directions, the petition is disposed of. Stay application and other pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J Mohita /34