MATTAMADUGU RAJASEKHAR REDDY & 2 ORS v. D.S.GANGADHAR & ANR
CMA/1333/2011 · 2025-07-31
Sumathi Jagadam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44590 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44590 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010365452011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI SMS bc^ijur .-#■ ml ■-V I FRIDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1333 OF 2011 Appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of C.P.C, against the order passed in I.A No.398/2011 in OS No.57/2011 dated 29.11.2011 on the file of the Additional District Judge, Hindupur, Anantapur District Between:
1. Mattamadugu Rajasekhar Reddy , S/o.M.Akkul Reddy, aged about 48 years, Hindu, Trader R/o.Karavulapalle, Gorantia Mandal, Anantapur District.
2. Mekalacheruvu Ramana, S/o.M.Venkatachalam, aged about 33 Hindu, Trader R/o.Mekalacheruvu, N.P. Kunta Mandal, Anantapur District. years.
3. Muddimadugu Kumaraswamy, S/o.Ramaswamy, aged about 44 years, Ex-Serviceman R/o.London Mission Compound, Muddanur, Kadapa District. ...APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS(DEFENDANTS) AND
1. D S Gangadhar, S/o.D.Suryaprakash, aged about 52 years, Hindu R/o.D.No.9-1-83, Panduranga Nagar, Hindupour, Anantapur District.
2. Y Prabhakar, S/o.Y.Lakshmana Rao, aged 46 years, Hindu, Trader R/o.Penukonda Road, Hindupour, Anantapur District. ...RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERSfPLAINTIFFS)
/ lA NO: 1 OF 2011(CMAMP 2238 OF 2011 V / Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the operation and effect of the order in lA No.398/2011 in OS No.57/2011 dated 29.11.2011 on the file of the Addl. District Judge. Hindupur, Anantapur District Counsel for the Appellants : SRI NAGARAJU NAGURU Counsel for the Respondents : SRI A ANANDA CHARY The Court made the following JUDGMENT :
/ i/ APHC010365452011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) SMS bCuUjr [3459] FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI CIVIL miscellaneous APPEAI Mn- JAGADAM 1333/2011 Between:
1. mattamadugu rajasekhar REDDY, HINDU TRADER r., MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT.
REDDY & 2 ORS, S/O.M.AKKUL r/o.karavulapalle, gorantla 2.MEKALACHERUVU trader R/n S/O.M.VENKATACHALAM . R/O.MEKALACHERUVU, NP KUNTa ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. KUNTA . HINDU MANDAL, ■ 3.MUDDIMADUGU KUMARASWAMY, SERVICEMAN R/O.LONDON MISSION .kadapa district S/O.RAMASWAMY COMPOUND, MUDDANUR EX- .■.APPELLANT(S) AND 1.D S GANGADHAR R/O.D.NO.9-1-83, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ANR, PANDURANGA S/O.D.SURYAPRAKASH NAGAR, HINDU HINDUPOUR 2.Y PRABHAKAR or- S/O.Y.LAKSHMANA R/O.PENUKONDA road, HINDUPOUR RAO, HINDU TRADER ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S):
lA NO: 1 OF 2011(CMAMP 2238 OF 901 i rZtr rire™ suspend the operation and effect of the may be pleased
order in lA No.398/2011. in OS
It' No.57/2001 dated 29.11.2011 on the file ofthe Addl. District Judge. Hindupur, Anantapur District Counsel for the Appellant(S):
1.NAGARAJU NAGURU Counsel for the Respondent(S); 1.AANANDACHARY
2. N ASWARTHA NARAYANA The Court made the following JUDGMENT: Sri T. Ravi Teja, learned counsel, representing Sri Nagaraju Naguru,
learned counsel for the appellants submits that the cause in the civil miscellaneous appeal does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission of learned counsel for the appellants, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
SD/- E.KAMESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. The Additional District Judge, Hindupur, Anantapur District
2. One CC to Sri. Nagaraju Naguru Advocate [OPUC]
3. OneCCto Sri. A Ananda Chary Advocate [OPUC]
4. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi
5. Two CD Copies stu TAC
HIGH COURT DATED:01/08/2025
JUDGMENT CMA NO. 1333 OF 2011 DISMISSING THE CMA AS INFRUCTUOUS