Figures are wrong; send the main file. PNB vs. Mehar Chand Cr.MP(M) No. 340 of 2025 Reserved on: 19.08.2026 27.08.2026 Present: Mr Sanjay Dalmia, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr Nand Lal Chauhan, Advocate, for the respondent. The learned trial Court held that there was no evidence to show what amount was due and payable on 14.05.2018, the date of issuance of the cheque. The statement of account (Ext.C-7) shows that ₹ 6,85,105/- was due on 22.01.2018 and ₹6,85,605/- was due on 12.07.2018. The cheque was issued on 14.05.2018 for ₹6,85,000/-. Thus, as per the statement of account, more than ₹6,85,000/-was due before and after issuance of the cheque, and the conclusion drawn by the learned Trial Court is, prima facie, vulnerable. Hence, there are arguable points involved in the present appeal, and leave to appeal is granted. The present application stands disposed of. Cr. Revision No. of 2026 (Cr. AST / 1150/25) The leave to appeal has been granted as per the order passed in Cr.MP(M) No. 340 of 2025. The respondent/accused is directed to furnish personal and surety bonds in the sum of ₹25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court/learned Additional Registrar (Judicial) of this Court within four weeks, undertaking to appear before this Court as and when directed to do so and surrender before the learned Trial Court in case of acceptance of the appeal. The learned Trial Court is directed to transmit the bonds, so furnished by the accused, for placing them on record. The records of the learned Courts below have been received. List the matter for hearing in due course. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 27th August, 2026 (Ravinder)