Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44586 (RAJ)

DURGSINGH S/O HUKMI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/14067/2025 · 2025-12-01

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:48764] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14067/2025 1. Durgsingh S/o Hukmi, Aged About 63 Years, R/o Village Tasimo Police Station Saipau District Dholpur (Raj.) (Accused Petitioner Is In Judicial Custody In District Jail Dholpur). 2. Jitendra S/o Durgsingh, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Village Tasimo Police Station Saipau District Dholpur (Raj.) (Accused Petitioner Is In Judicial Custody In District Jail Dholpur). 3. Jaysingh S/o Durgsingh, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Village Tasimo Police Station Saipau District Dholpur (Raj.) (Accused Petitioner Is In Judicial Custody In District Jail Dholpur). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sumit Kumar Jain with Mr. Dhananjay Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 01/12/2025 1. The petitioners have filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.378/2025 registered at Police Station Saipau, District Dholpur for offence under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 121(1), 132, 109(1), 262, 329(4), 324(4) BNS and Section 3 PDPP Act. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. [2025:RJ-JP:48764] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-14067/2025] 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that ten co-accused were released on bail by this Court on 11.11.2025 and co-accused Sunil was released on the bail by the trial Court on 09.10.2025. He further submits that no injury which is dangerous to life is caused by the petitioners. The trial of the case will take considerable time and no further custodial interrogation is required, hence the bail application of the petitioners may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Durgsingh S/o Hukmi, Jitendra S/o Durgsingh and Jaysingh S/o Durgsingh be released on bail provided they furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/4