1 2025:CGHC:50276 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5265 of 2025 1 - Smt. Ferhi Bai W/o Late Jagturam, Aged About 64 Years Caste Satnami, R/o Village Jarway Heerapur, Tahsil And District Raipur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Revenue Department, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Collector, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Land Acquisition Officer/ Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 4 - National Highway Authority Of India Through Its Project Director, Plot No. A-7, Vip Estate, Shankar Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Chandrasen Chouhan, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mrs. Akanksha Verma Dabhadkar, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 09/10/2025 1. The defaults raised by the Registry is hereby dropped. 2. The petitioner has filed this writ petition on the following reliefs: “10.1. That the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for entire record pertaining to 2 the case of the petitioner in the interest of justice. 10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to direct the respondents to consider pending representation and to return back awarded compensation to the respondent authorities and also to correct the revenue record in the name of the petitioner at the earliest within stipulated time, in the interest of justice. 10.3 Any other relief which may be suitable in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be granted.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks a direction from this Court to command and direct the respondents to consider pending representation and to return back the awarded compensation to the respondent authorities and also to correct the revenue record in the name of the petitioner at the earliest. 4. Learned counsel for the State contended that the petitioner has already taken compensation amount and now is demanding his land back. 5. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties and perused the record with utmost circumspection. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions 3 of the counsels for the respective parties, it is an undisputed fact that the petitioner’s land was acquired for construction of road on National Highway and the petitioner received compensation for an amount of Rs. 18, 28, 750/-. In the considered opinion of this Court, since the petitioner has already received the compensation amount, therefore, the present petition is not maintainable. 7. With the aforesaid observation/direction, the petition stands dismissed. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE Madhurima