APHC011004122017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 42001/2017 Between: 1. V. CHANDRASEKHAR REDDY,, S/O LATE V.C. MADDILETI REDDY AGED ABOUT 53YRS, OCC: MANAGER R/O SURVEPALLI SITE NEAR KRISHNAPATNAM NELLORE DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. ANDHRA PRADESH COOPERATIVE OIL SEEDS, GROWER'S FEDERATION LTD., 4TH FLOOR, C-BLOCK STALIN ENCLAVE, 2ND ROAD JAWAHAR AUTO NAGAR VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT REP. BY ITS VC 86 MANAGING DIRECTOR 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF ENQUIRIES, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH GENERAL ADMINISTRATION (COI.KSR) DEPARTMENT 1ST FLOOR, BUILDING-5 ROOM NO.214, A.P. SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT 3. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPT. BY ITS SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT AGRICULTURE AND COOPERATION (VIG.I) DEPT., SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the Respondents in proceeding to 2 conduct Departmental Enquiry against the petitioner in pursuant to the notice No.59/COLKSR/2017, dt.21-11-2017 issued by the respondent No.2 before commencing the trial in C.C.No.223/2017 on the file of Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Sattupalli, Khammam District as arbitrary, illegal and consequently direct the respondents not to conduct disciplinary enquiry against the petitioner before completing the trial in the criminal case i.e, C.C.No.223/2017 on the file of Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Sattupalli, Khammam District in the interest of justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 52097 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in the Disciplinary Enquiry initiated against the petitioner in pursuant to the notice No.59/COI.KSR/2017, dt.21- 11-2017 issue by the respondent No.2 pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. M PAPA REDDY 2. GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION (AP) 3. GP FOR AGRICULTURE (AP) The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri M. Kranthi Gireesh, learned counsel representing Sri P. Nagendra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the subsequent events taken place in the lis, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication. 2. Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 24.12.2025 PNS