[2025:RJ-JP:42840] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15569/2025 Alok Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Munshilal, Aged About 53 Years, Resident Of Chanakya Puri Colony, Rajgarh, Alwar, Rajasthan- 301408 At Present Posted At The Post Of Unani Senior Compounder At Unani Hospital Machadi, Tehsil Reni, District Alwar And President Sevarat Unani Nurses Union, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Director Of Unani, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Director, Directorate Of Unani Chikitsa Vibhag, Ayush Bhawan, Sector 26, Pratap Nagar, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajpal Dhankar For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 16/10/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “i) by an appropriate writ, order or direction the respondent department be directed to quash the order dated 31.08.2025 in respect of the implementation of the “RAJSSO-AMS” application for recording the daily attendance of the petitioner employees of the respondent department and ; ii) Grant such further relief(s) which in the facts and circumstances of this case may do complete justice to the petitioner; and [2025:RJ-JP:42840] (2 of 3) [CW-15569/2025] iii) Cost of the writ petition be awarded to the petitioner..” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner while referring order dated 06.10.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.19089/2025 titled as The Rajasthan Homeo-Physicians Association Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors., order dated 04.09.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.16890/2025 titled as Association of Rajasthan Cooperative Subordinate Services Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. and order dated 28.05.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10944/2025 titled as Dr. Indrajeet Singh and Ors. Vs. State of Rajsthan and Ors. passed by Co-ordinate Benches of this Hon’ble Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur and submits that respondents have directed to mark attendance on RajSSO_AMS (Attendance Management System), which is in fact a tracking application. He further submits that there are several issues in Login at different places and department will collect personal data of petitioner and it is likely that the App will only be used for tracking activities of petitioner. 3. After considering his submissions when we have asked about the technical advancement in marking attendance by using geofencing then he submits that petitioner be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents authority to consider and resolve the grievances, raised by him. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the [2025:RJ-JP:42840] (3 of 3) [CW-15569/2025] respondents-Authority within a period of 15 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about the grievances raised herein by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /58