IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI i FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 823 OF 2017 Appeal filed under Section 173 of M.V. Act against the Judgment and Decree dated:07-01-2015 in M.V.O.P.No.598 of 2010 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal -cum-V Additional District Judge, Tirupathi. Between: - M/S. Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd.,, represented by its Branch Manager, 3rd floor, Subramanian Building, No.1, Club House Road, Chennai, Tamilnadu. ...APPELLANT/RESPONDENT N0.2 AND 1. P. Pullaiah, S/o Santhaiah, Hindu, aged about 24 years, coolie, residing at D.No.12/504, Bhaskarpet, Srikalahasthi Town, Chittoor District. 2. S.Saravanan, S/o T.V.Subramani Chettiar, Hindu, age not known to the petitioner, but he is major, residing at D.No.40/30, Bazar Street, Tiruvalam, Katpadi Taluq, Tamilnadu. ...RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER R1 I.A. NO: 2 OF 2016(MACMAMP. NO: 5855 OF 2016) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stay of execution of the decree and all further proceedings passed in MVOP.No.598/2010 dated 07.01.2015 on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal cum V Addl. District Judge, Tirupati. Counsel for the Appellant(s):SRI. CHEKURI SRIPATI RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI C HARI PREETH Counsel for the Respondent No.2:— The Court made the following JUDGMENT:- /• • ':X APHC010503882017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3520] FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 823/2017 Between: M/s Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd. ...APPELLANT AND P Pullaiah Another and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant: 1.CHEKURI SRIPATI RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.CHARI PREETH The Court made the following: 9^ 2 JUDGMENT: Learned counsel for the respondent/claimant alone is present. Despite the matter being posted today i.e., on 25.04.2025 2. under the caption ‘For Dismissal’, there is no representation for the appellant/lnsurance Company. On 21.03.2025 and 04.04.2025 there was no representation for the appellant/lnsurance Company. Therefore, it evinces that the appellant/lnsurance Company 3. has no interest to prosecute the case. Hence, the present MACMA is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending and the Interim order granted earlier, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- N NAGAMMA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-V Additional District Judge, Tirupathi, Chittoor District, (with records, if any) 2. One CC to Sri. Chekuri Sripati Rao, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri. C Hari Preeth, Advocate [OPUC] 4. The Section Officer, V.R Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. 5. Three CD Copies RDB VNA HIGH COURT DATE0:25/04/2025 JUDGMENT MACMA.No.823 of 2017 wof 19 JUN 2025 % ^ . Current oecuon . ^ %!^espATCHt^ m *3: Co DISMISSING THE MAGMA FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS