SRI. YALLAPPA S/O BASAPPA WADDAR v. THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER
MFA/100832/2023 · 2025-03-08
Lok Adalath
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44573 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44573 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, DHARWAD BENCH BEFORE THE LOK ADALATH IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT:
HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA AND SHRI MAQBOOLAHAMED M. PATIL, MEMBER M.F.A.No.100832/2023 [MV] (Lok Adalat No.224/2025)
BETWEEN:
SRI. YALLAPPA S/O. BASAPPA WADDAR AGE. 40 YEARS, OCC. HOTEL BUSINESS, AT. PRESENT NIL, R/O. DURGADEVI NAGAR, MUNDARAGI, TQ. MUNDARAGI, DIST. GADAG. ...APPELLANT (By SRI. ANJANEYA M., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER NWKRTC, GOKUL ROAD, HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD.
2. THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER NWKRTC, P.B. ROAD, HAVERI, DIST. HAVERI.
2
3. THE CONTROLLER NWKRTC, RANEBENNUR BUS STAND, RANEBENNUR, DIST. HAVERI.
4. MR. SHAIKHMOINODDIN D KHAIRATI S/O. DADAHYATH, AGE. MAJOR, OCC. TRANSPORT BUSINESS, R/O. MADNI, JASJID, TABIB LAND FISH MARKET, HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD-580 024.
5. THE AREA MANAGER RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, KALBURGI SQUIRE, DESAI CROSS, DESPANDE NAGAR, HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD-580 029.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. S.C.BHUTI, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3;
SRI. SURESH S.GUNDI, ADVOCATE FOR R5)
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MOTOR VEHICLE ACT, 1988, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 24-02-2022 PASSED IN MVC NO.31/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDITIONAL MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL RANEBENNUR, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
THE APPEAL BEING REFERRED TO LOK ADALAT, COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION, THIS DAY, THE LOK ADALAT PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
3
CONCILIATION ORDER The learned counsel for the appellant-claimant and the representative of Respondents-NWKRTC along with its counsel are present.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo for withdrawal, which reads as under:
“In view of the Corporation appeal is allowed in part by reducing the interest, the above claimant’s appeal is liable to be dismissed as withdrawn.”
3. In view of the memo filed by the learned counsel for the appellant, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- MEMBER VNP CT:VH