Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4457 (GAU)

Smti Tayo Devi v. The Union of India and 2 Ors

WP(C)/149/2025 · 2025-04-09

Kalyan Rai Surana

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040005022025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/149/2025 Smti Tayo Devi Daughter of Tayo Nima, resident of Damsite Naharlagun, Near Saint Francise School, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh 791110 and carrying on proprietorship trade business in the name of M/s Lokam Taong Enterprise VERSUS The Union of India and 2 Ors represented by the Secretary to the Govt of India, Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), North Block, New Delhi. 2:The Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Itanagar Age: 0 Occupation : Sector A Naharlagun Arunachal Pradesh. 3:The Superintendent of Central Goods and Service Tax Age: 0 Occupation : Koloriang Range Koloriang Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Gyamar Jeevan, Bamang Tatung,Risso Aking,Tao Tarin,Taying Nega Advocate for the Respondent : Marto Kato, M K Boro,DSGI Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA ORDER Date : 10.04.2025 Heard Mr. Z. Tapa, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. M. Kato, learned Dy.S.G.I. appearing for the respondent No. 1 and Mr. M. K. Boro, learned standing counsel for the CGST appearing for respondents No. 2 & 3. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there is certain inadvertent mistake in the pleadings and therefore, prays for allow him to withdraw the writ petition with a liberty to file a fresh. Prayer is allowed. Writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal with a liberty as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant