1 2025:CGHC:49013 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5092 of 2025 1 - Shobharam Patel S/o Shri Barat Ram Patel Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Laladhurva, Tehsil Sarangarh, District Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.) 2 - Hoshchandra Patel S/o Shri Chhbilal Patel Aged About 48 Years R/o Village Laladhurva, Tehsil Sarangarh, District Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.) 3 - Shri Ishwar Prasad Patel S/o Kalapram, Aged About 75 Years R/o Village Laladhurva, Tehsil Sarangarh, District Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.) 4 - Shobharam Patel S/o Shri Ramprasad, Aged About 49 Years R/o Village Laladhurva, Tehsil Sarangarh, District Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.) 5 - Mohanlal Patel S/o Shri Gayaprasad Patel Aged About 70 Years R/o Village Laladhurva, Tehsil Sarangarh, District Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.) 6 - Kaushal Kumar Patel S/o Jaylal Patel Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Laladhurva, Tehsil Sarangarh, District Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.) 7 - Bedram Patel S/o Narayan Patel, Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Laladhurva, Tehsil Sarangarh, District Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Revenue And Disaster Management Department, New Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Collector, Sarangarh, District Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.) 3 - Sub Divisional Officer (R) And Land Acquisition Officer, District Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.) 4 - Enviornment Officer, Sarangarh, District Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.) ----Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Prabhat Kumar Saxena, Advocate For Respondent-State : Mr. Satish Gupta, G.A. Digitally signed by JYOTI JHA Date: 2025.09.26 11:38:01 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 24/09/2025 1. At the outset, today learned counsel for petitioner placed a memo before the Court dated 23.09.2025 which is taken on record and submits that in the light of memo issued by the Collector and the order passed by the Regional Officer, Chhattisgarh Environment Protection Board, Raigarh, dated 22.08.2025, the present writ petition has become infrctuous. 2. The State Counsel does not oppose the same. 3. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous. 4. However, the petitioner is at liberty to file fresh petition, if any new cause of action arises. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge Jyoti