IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 8744 OF 2019 Between: 1. Rachagiri Basavaiah, S/o. Venkataratnam, aged 26 years, R/o. D. No. 3-165, ST Colony, Korrapadu Post, Medikonduru Mandal, Guntur ^ District - 522438. 2. Dudiki Sivarama Krishna, S/o. Venkateswarlu, aged 32 years, R/o. D. No. 1-16, Medikonduru Post, Medikonduru Mandal, Guntur District. ...Petitioners AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Chief Secretary, Building #1, 1st Floor, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh-522503 2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Department of Panchayat Raj and Rural Development, Room No. 107, 5th Block, Ground Floor, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur. Andhra Pradesh- 522503 3. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Department of Municipal Administration and Urban Development, Room No. 140, 2nd Block, Ground Floor, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh- 522503 4. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Department of Finance, 2nd Block, 1st Floor, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh- 522503. 5. The Union of India, Represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Panchayat Raj, 11th Floor, J.P. Building, Kasturbha Gandhi Marg, Connaught Place, New Delhi, Delhi-110001. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to it is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may he pleased to pass an order, writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus set a side the impugned GO. Ms. No. 104 dt. 22-06-2019 illegal and void as it is violative of the fundamental rights of the petitioner under Arts. 14 and 16 of the constitution of India. as lA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to undertake any further process of recruitment to public employment as village volunteer pursuant to the schedule in the impugned GO. Ms. No.104 dated 22.06.2019, pending disposal of the main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI. GINJUPALLI SUBBA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: THE ADVOCATE GENERAL/ " Counsel for the Respondent No. 2: GP FOR PANCHYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.3: GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMIN AND URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.4: GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING Counsel for the Respondent No.5: SRI BETHAPALLI SURYANARAYANA / CENTRAL GOVERNMENT COUNSEL The Court made the following order: APHC010202472019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3336] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 8744/2019 ) \ Between: Rachagiri Basavaiah, and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.GINJUPALLI SUBBA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.BETHAPALLI SURYANARAYANA (CENTRAL GOVT COUNSEL) 2.GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING (AP) 3.THE ADVOCATE GENERAL (AP) 4.GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV (AP) 5.GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV ...RESPONDENT(S) The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioners seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: "... to pass an order writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus set aside the impugned G.O.Ms.No.l04 dt.22.06.2019 as illegal and void as it is violative of the fundamental rights of the petitioner under Arts 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India." 2. When the matter is taken up, learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and that the relief sought for has become infructuous. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader is in attendance. 2 • ,5 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. / Sd/- J SAROJA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR /F SECTION OFFICER / //TRUE COPY// To 1. One CC to Sri. Ginjupalli Subba Rao Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to [OPUC] Sri. Bethapalli Suryanarayana Central Government Counsel ✓ 3. Two CCs to The Advocate General, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 4. Two CCs to GP for Panchyat Raj and Rural Development, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 5. Two CCs to GP for Muncipal Admin and Urban dev. High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 6. Two CCs to GP for Finance Planning, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 7. Three CD Copies GSC HIGH COURT DATED:25/04/2025 \ ORDER WP.No.8744 of 2019 £? oVs g 2^ SEP 2025 fo Current Secuon ★ /; DISMISSING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS