RAJNISH JAIN S/O HUKUM CHAND JAIN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLW/460/2021 · 2025-10-30
Anand Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44563 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44563 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:43637] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 460/2021 Rajnish Jain S/o Hukum Chand Jain, R/o Bade Mandidr Ke Piche, Jhalrapatan, District Jhalawar (Raj.) (Petitioner Is The Registered Owner Of The Vehicle I.e. Tractor Bearing Registration No. Rj-17- Ra-5591 With Trolley) ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
2. Assistant Mining Engineer, Jhalawar (Raj.)
3. Station House Officer, Police Station Jhalrapatan, District Jhalawar (Raj.)
4. R.t.o. Jhalawar, Rajasthan. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 426/2021 Rajneesh Jain S/o Hukumchand, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Bade Mandir Ke Piche, Jhalrapatan District Jhalawar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 30/10/2025
1. These petitions were filed way back in the year 2021 and since then, the defects pointed out by the office have not been cured.
[2025:RJ-JP:43637] (2 of 2) [CRLW-460/2021]
2. Nobody is present on behalf of the petitioner to pursue the instant petitions. It appears that the petitioner is not keen to pursue the matters on merits.
3. Hence, these petitions are dismissed for want of prosecution.
(ANAND SHARMA),J Jatin /95-96