[2025:RJ-JP:50483] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19014/2025 Ramawatar Meghwal Son Of Sh. Ramnath Meghwal, aged about 45 years, Resident of Meghwal Basti Noopur, Kota, Rajasthan. Presently serving as Temporary Langar/Cook, Police Line Mess, Jhalawar-Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through Additional Chief Secretary (Home), Home Department, Secretariat, Ashok Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan, pin code- 302005; 2. Director General of Police, Rajasthan, Police Head Quarter (PHQ), Lal Kothi, Jaipur-302015; 3. Inspector General of Police, Kota Range, Kota; 4. Superintendent of Police, District – Jhalawar- Rajasthan. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. M.S. Raghav Mr. Vishwas Saini Mr. Mananjay Singh Ms. Kirti Rathore Mr. Chetan Khandel For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vishnu Dutt Sharma for Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 15/12/2025 1. Instant writ petition is filed by petitioner with following prayer:- 1) or Issue an appropriate writ, order, direction directing the respondents to regularise the services of the petitioner as Langar (Cook) in the Reserve Police Line, Jhalawar, against the vacant on 11.07.2025, in view of vacant sanctioned post which fell his twenty-four years of continuous [2025:RJ-JP:50483] (2 of 3) [CW-19014/2025] service and the recommendation of the Superintendent of Police, Jhalawar. 2) Direct the respondents to issue a formal appointment order in favour of the petitioner on the post of Langar (Cook), with all consequential benefits. 3) Direct the respondents to grant all consequential benefits to the petitioner, including: regular pay scale applicable to Langar, seniority continuity the post of of service, of date the from eligibility, arrears of salary, and all other admissible service benefits. 4) Direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's case Rajasthan Contractual under the Hiring to Civil Posts Rules, 2020, and extend to him the benefit of regularisation as contemplated therein. 5) Pass any other writ, order, or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem just, equitable, and proper in the interest of justice. 2. Mr. Vishnu Dutt Sharma on behalf of Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG accepts notice for respondents. 3. Office is directed to reflect the name of Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG as counsel for respondents. 4. Learned counsel for petitioner while placing reliance upon order dated 18.12.2013 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6415/2020 titled as Raju Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors., which was upheld by the Division Bench of this Court in D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No.186/2015 in case of State of Rajasthan and Ors. Vs. Raju Lal and further SLP by State was dismissed by Hon’ble Supreme Court on 26.10.2015 submits that the order passed in case of Raju Lal (supra) was further [2025:RJ-JP:50483] (3 of 3) [CW-19014/2025] considered by Hon’ble Single Bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6010/2014 titled as Rajendra Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. and the order is upheld by the Division Bench by dismissing the D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.510/2019 on 29.01.2020. 5. Learned counsel for respondents submits that petitioner be given liberty to submit a representation and the Department will examine the representation after due screening. 6. After considering the submission and also the material placed on record, the writ petition is disposed at this stage in light of judgment in case of Rajendra Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra), which was upheld in D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.510/2019 passed on the basis of a Division Bench judgment dated 20.04.2015 in case of State of Rajasthan Vs. Raju Lal (supra)- D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No.186/2015. 7. The respondents are directed to examine eligibility of the petitioner pursuant to the directions in case of Raju Lal (supra) and Rajendra Singh (supra) and only in case of deviation and non-applicability of ratio on the facts of the present case, they are free to pass an appropriate reasoned and speaking order under intimation to the petitioner. 8. Needless to say that if petitioner is entitled and the post is vacant, then all benefits be entitled in accordance with said ratio. 9. Accordingly, the writ petition with pending application(s), if any also stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /23