Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:4599 WP No. 100959 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 100959 OF 2025 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN:
UDAY S/O NAGARAJ KELAGERI, AGE. 24 YEARS, OCC. PRIVATE SERVICES, R/O SADHUNAVAR ESTATE, OPPOSITE AGRICULTURE UNIVERSITY, DHARWAD. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. AKASH.R.NAIK., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE POLICE INSPECTOR, SUB-URBAN POLICE STATION, DHARWAD-580 001.
2.
COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, HUBBALLI DHARWAD COMMISSIONERATE, HUBBALLI-DHARWAD POLICE COMMISSIONER, OFFICE, PB ROAD, NAVANAGAR, HUBBALLI-580 025.
3.
SPECIAL EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE AND DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE (L AND O), HUBBALLI-DHARWAD-580 025. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRAVEEN.K.UPPAR., AGA)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:4599 WP No. 100959 of 2025
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
Sri.Akash R.Naik., counsel for the petitioner and Sri.Praveen K.Uppar, AGA for respondents have appeared in person.
2. The order dated 11.01.2025 passed by the second respondent under Section 55 of the Karnataka Police Act, 1963 is called in question in this writ petition on several grounds as setout in the Memorandum of Writ Petition.
3. Counsel for the respective parties urged several contentions. Heard the arguments and perused the Writ papers with care.
4. As against the order passed under Section 55 of the Karnataka Police Act, 1963, there is an alternate and statutory remedy of filing an appeal under Section 59 of the Karnataka Police Act, 1963. Hence, I decline to exercise power under writ jurisdiction.
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:4599 WP No. 100959 of 2025
5. Resultantly, the Writ petition is dismissed.
Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 83