Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44549 (AP)

G BHAGEERADHI RAO v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/9485/2025 · 2025-04-29

Challa Gunaranjan

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 9485 OF 2025 Between: G Bhageeradhi Rao, S/o Lohithasudu Aged 61 years, R/o Pedabayalu Village and Mandal Alluru Seetharamaraju District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh The Director, Tribal Welfare, AP Vijayawada The Deputy Director, Tribal welfare, Paderu, Alluru Seetharamaraju District G. Srinivasa Reddy, Supdt., O/o Deputy Director, Tribal Welfare Parvathipuram Manyam District 2. 3. 4. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus and declare that Proceedings dated 31- 05-2023 are in accordance with transfer policy of the government regular and in course of normal administrative actions and consequently may one as pass an order restraining his relocation to any other place of posting till his retirement on superannuation on 30-06-2026. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings issued by Respondent no. 1,2 pending the final disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. KUPPILI MURALIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: GP FOR SERVICES II The Court made the following order: APHC010182762025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) 0E0 [3506] I _ WEDNESDAY ,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 9485/2025 Between: G Bhageeradhi Rao ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.KUPPILI MURALIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR SERVICES II 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: The present Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief/s;- "...to issue an appropriate writ order or direction particularly one In the nature of Writ of Mandamus and declare that Proceedings dated 31.05.2023 are in accordance with transfer policy of the government as regular and in course of normal administrative actions and consequently pass an order restraining his relocation to any other place of posting till his retirement on superannuation on 30.06.2026 and pass such other order or orders....” Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Assistant Government 2. Pleader for Services-I for respondents. Petitioner is presently working as Superintendent in the office of Deputy 3. Director, Tribal Welfare, Paderu, Alluru Seetharamaraju District, on regular basis. However, now respondent No.4 who is also a Superintendent working at Tribal Welfare Department, Parvathipuram Manyam District, has been deputed to work along with petitioner in the cadre of Superintendent on OD basis by proceedings dated 27.09.2024 issued by respondent No.3. As respondent No.4 has been also deputed to work along with petitionerwhere there is only one post of Superintendent, petitioner apprehends that he would be relocated from such place in order to accommodate respondent No.4 on regular basis. The proceedings dated 27.09.2024 indicates that the aforesaid 4. arrangement was made for administrative convenience and respondent No.4 3 has been deputed to work at Paderu in the cadre of Superintendent purely on OD basis but not on regular basis. Therefore, the apprehension of the petitioner is premature, in case respondents take any further steps to continue respondent No.4 on regular basis, petitioner is granted liberty to challenge the same. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand SOI- A. VENUGOPALA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OFFICER closed. //TRUE COPY// To, 1. The Principal Secretary Tribal Welfare Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh 2. The Director, Tribal Welfare, AP Vijayawada 3. The Deputy Director, Tribal welfare , Paderu, Alluru Seetharamaraju District Kuppili Muralidhar Advocate [OPUC] High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 4. OneCCto Sri. 5. Two CCs to GP for Services II 6. Three CD Copies GSC •fip HIGH COURT DATED:30/04/2025 ORDER WP.No.9485 of 2025 DISPOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS