Research › Search › Judgment
Bombay High Court · body
2025 DAILYLAW 44547 (BOM)
SHUBHAM NAGORAO RUPANAR v. THE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR, YAVATMAL AND OTHERS
CAW/28/2025 · 2025-01-09
Smt M S Jawalkar
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44547 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44547 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 2 wp 7412-2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO.28/2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO.7412/2024 Shubham Nagorao Rupanar Vs. The Additional Collector, Yavatmal and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri A.R. Ingole, Advocate for petitioner Ms Soniya Thakur, AGP for respondent Nos.1 and 2 CORAM :
SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR, J.
DATED : 09/01/2025
The present application is filed for grant of permission to amend the petition to bring on record subsequent events after filing of the petition. By way of this amendment, petitioner seeks permission to add paragraph No.5-A as well as prayer Clause (i-a) challenging the impugned order passed subsequently during the pendency of petition.
2. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed.
3. Necessary amendment to be carried out within three days.
4. After amendment is carried out, issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 27.01.2025.
5. Learned AGP waives notice for respondents.
6. The application stands disposed of accordingly. JUDGE
2 2 wp 7412-2024 R.S. Sahare