[2025:RJ-JP:43309] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10404/2018 1. Hanuman Son Of Shri Balu, By Caste Balai, Resident Of Saledipura, Gram Panchayat Kerpura, Tehsil Khandela, District Sikar Raj. 2. Sanwar Mal Son Of Shri Mool Chand, By Caste Meena, Resident Of Kalusar, Tan Village Saledipura, Tehsil Khan- dela, District Sikar Raj. 3. Kamli Devi Wife Of Shri Gokul Chand, By Caste Meena, Resident Of Kalusar, Tan Village Saledipura, Tehsil Khan- dela, District Sikar Raj. 4. Sriram Meena Son Of Shri Jagdish Prasad Meena, By Caste Meena, Resident Of Kalusar, Tan Village Saledipura, Tehsil Khandela, District Sikar Raj. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Union Of India, Through Secretary, Ministry Of Power, Government Of India, Shram Shakti Bhawan, Rafi Marg, New Delhi. 2. Chairman And Managing Director, Rural Electrification Corporation, Government Of India, Cgo Complex, Lodi Road, New Delhi. 3. Pr. Secretary To Government, Energy Department, Gov- ernment Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur Raj. 4. District Collector, Sikar Raj. 5. Managing Director, Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd., Hati Bhata, Ajmer Raj. 6. Superintending Engineer, Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd., Sikar Raj. 7. Executive Engineer, Oandm, Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd, Sikar Raj. 8. Executive Engineer Oandm, Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd., Neemkathana, District Sikar Raj. 9. Assistant Engineer, Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd., Khan- dela, District Sikar Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ajay Gupta with Ms. Sampati Sharma For Respondent(s) : Ms. Shruti Pareek HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 29/10/2025 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that under the Deen Dayal Upadhyay Gram Jyoti Yojana (DDUGJY) [2025:RJ-JP:43309] (2 of 3) [CW-10404/2018] Scheme, 33 KV GSS line was laid by Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. i.e., respondent Nos. 5 to 9. Counsel submits that before laying electricity lines, no permission was taken from the petitioners and agricultural/residential lands of the petitioners have been used to complete the project without their permission. Counsel submits that in these circumstances, petitioners are entitled to get compensation. Counsel submits that according to the reply submitted by respondent No.2- Chairman and Managing Director, Rural Electrification Corporation, Government of India, concerned State power project implementing agency i.e., Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. is responsible for formulation, planning, design, engineering, development and implementation of the projects. Counsel submits that in these circumstances, petitioners may be allowed to submit a comprehensive representation before the Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. for grant of compensation in lieu of using their land for the purpose of laying the electricity lines. In view of above, this court deems it just and proper to dispose of this writ petition with liberty to the petitioners to file a comprehensive representation before respondent No.5 i.e., Managing Director, Ajmer Vidhut Vitran Nigam Ltd. raising their grievance. If any such representation is filed by the petitioners before respondent No.5 within a period of one month from today, respondent No.5 is directed to consider and decide the same by way of passing a speaking order in accordance with rules, regulations and schemes. It is further directed that respondent [2025:RJ-JP:43309] (3 of 3) [CW-10404/2018] No.5 shall intimate the petitioners about fate of the representation. The entire exercise shall be done by respondent No.5 within a period of two months from the date of submission of representation along with certified copy of this order. This Court has not passed any observation on the merits of the case and thus, if any representation is filed by the petitioners, same may be decided in accordance with law without being influenced or prejudiced by this order. Stay application and pending application(s), (if any) also stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /19