Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44541 (RAJ)

DINESH URF DHANNALAL S/O SHRI PRABHULAL GURJAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/13092/2025 · 2025-12-15

Vinod Kumar Bharwani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:50588] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13092/2025 Dinesh Urf Dhannalal S/o Shri Prabhulal Gurjar, R/o Village Dhuni, Gurjaraan, Aakodiya, Tehsil Chaksu, District Jaipur. (Presently Accused Petitioner Is Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deepak Chauhan with Mr. Chinmaya Mudgal & Mr./Ms. Ananya Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI Order 15/12/2025 The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioner in the matter arising out of F.I.R. No.285/2025 registered at Police Station Shivdaspura District Jaipur City (South) for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 109(1) of B.N.S. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case, he has nothing to do with the alleged offence and he is behind the bars since 25.09.2025. After investigation, charge-sheet has been filed in the matter. Trial of the case is likely to take a long time to conclude, till then, his further incarceration would not serve any fruitful purpose and he is ready and willing to furnish his bail bonds. Therefore, the bail application deserves to be allowed. [2025:RJ-JP:50588] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13092/2025] Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the x-ray report & injury report of the injured, namely Mr. Narayan Gurjar, and the material made available on record. Taking into consideration the submissions put forth and overall facts & circumstances of the case but without commenting upon detailed merits of the case, this Court deems it fit to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. Therefore, the bail application is allowed. Accused-petitioner, namely Dinesh Urf Dhannalal S/o Shri Prabhulal Gurjar, shall be released on bail, if he is not required in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Fifty Thousand) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five Thousand) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any other Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when he is called upon to do so. (VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J SAURABH /64