Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4454 (GAU)

M/s Reniya Enterprises v. The State of AP and 6 Ors

WP(C)/183/2024 · 2025-04-06

Kalyan Rai Surana

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040005792024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/183/2024 M/s Reniya Enterprises proprietorship Firm having its registered address at D Sector, P and T Colony, Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh and duly represented by its proprietor Takam Pario, Jullang, Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS The State of AP and 6 Ors represented by the Secretary, Department of Power, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh 2:The Superintending Engineer (Electrical) Age: 0 Occupation : Arunachal Pradesh Electrical Circle V Department of Power Ziro 3:The State Nodal Officer (RDSS) cum Chief Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : Department of Power Itanagar Arunachal Pradesh 4:The Chief Engineer (Power) Age: 0 Occupation : EEZ/CEZ/WEZ/ Department of Power Itanagar Arunachal Pradesh Page No.# 2/3 5:The Executive Engineer (Electrical) Age: 0 Occupation : Daporijo Electrical Division Department of Power Daporijo Arunachal Pradesh 6:M/s D and G Construction Age: 0 Occupation : D Sector 02 Ground Floor NH 52A Naharlaguhn Arunachal Pradesh 791110 7:M/s T and T Projects Limited Age: 0 Occupation : T-3 Parmeshwan Building Chatribari Guwahati 781001 Kamrup(M) Assa Advocate for the Petitioner : Marto Kato, M Hussain,P Mahanta Advocate for the Respondent : Lissing Perme, SC(Power) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA ORDER Date : 07.04.2025 Both sides are duly represented. Upon instruction, Mr. M. Kato, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous. Page No.# 3/3 Accordingly, the matter stands closed having been rendered infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant