Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44538 (RAJ)

CHANDRAKALA D/O SHRI KANHAIYA LAL BAIRWA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/17272/2025 · 2025-11-24

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:48127] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17272/2025 Chandrakala D/o Shri Kanhaiya Lal Bairwa, Aged About 42 Years, Resident Of Kishanganj Tehsil Atru, District Baran, Rajasthan, (Currently Working As A Cook At The Government Ambedkar Hostel, Aatun, Baran, Rajasthan.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Social Justice And Empowerment, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Near 22 Godam Bridge, Jaipur. 3. Deputy Director, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, District Baran, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kailash Chander Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 24/11/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “A. By an appropriate writ, order or direction the respondents be directed to regularize services of petitioner on the post of Class-IV Servant/ respondent be directed to decide the petitioner representation on merit as early as possible. B. Any other relief as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper be also passed in favour of petitioner. .” [2025:RJ-JP:48127] (2 of 2) [CW-17272/2025] 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /134