SACHIN KUMAR S/O BIRBAL SINGH v. RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
CW/13047/2025 · 2025-09-11
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44537 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44537 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:36906] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13047/2025 Sachin Kumar S/o Birbal Singh, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Birmi, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. Reserve Bank Of India, Rambagh Circle Tonk Road, Jaipur 302004 Through Its Regional Director. 2. Indusind Bank, Branch Maan Nagar, Jhunjhunu, District Jhunjhunu Rajasthan Through Its Branch Manager. 3. The Station House Officer, Uppal Police Station, District Rachakonda, Telangana. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ajit Kaswa For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vinit Kumar Sharma Ms. Neha Sharma JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 11/09/2025
1. The instant writ petition has been preferred with the following prayer: (i) The respondents may kindly be directed to forthwith unfreeze the bank account of the petitioner. (ii) the respondents may kindly be directed to not freeze the bank account of the petitioner in future without prior notice. (iii) Any other order which this Hon’ble Court may deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case also be passed in favour of humble petitioners along with cost of writ petition..”
2. By way of filing this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking directions against the respondent-Bank for defreezing his account No.159256668607. [2025:RJ-JP:36906] (2 of 3) [CW-13047/2025]
3. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no concerned whatsoever with any cyber crime committed by anyone, even then his entire account has been freezed. Counsel submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to cooperate in the investigation as and when required. 4. Counsel for the respondents opposed the arguments raised by counsel for the petitioner and submitted that several complaints regarding cyber crimes were received in the State of Telangana, West Bengal and Maharashtra, consequently, orders have been passed to freeze the petitioner’s account. 5. In view of the submissions made before this Court, the instant writ petition stands disposed of with directions to the respondent-Bank to defreeze the Bank account of the petitioner bearing No.159256668607 at Indusland Bank Branch, Maan Nagar, Jhunjhunu and he may be allowed to operate and make transactions in the said Bank. 6. The respondents are directed to freeze the disputed amount i.e. 5000/- which is allegedly involved in the fraudulent transaction. 7. It is made clear that the petitioner will co-operate with Bank authorities and investigating agency and will appear before them as and when required. 8.
This Court also observes that the petitioner shall not close or discontinue the aforesaid account till the investigating agency and Bank authorities permit him to do so. 9. It is further ordered that after investigation, if the involvement of the petitioner is found in any illegal transaction, he
[2025:RJ-JP:36906] (3 of 3) [CW-13047/2025] shall be liable to pay amount involved in the aforesaid illegal transaction and will face inquiry/investigation as per law. 10. It is further ordered that the respondent-Bank shall be at liberty to transfer the amount to the original account from which it was credited to petitioner’s account. 11. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/23